NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE v. DOW CHEM. CO., 327 Ark. 504 (1997)

NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE, et al. v. DOW CHEMICAL CO., et al. 96-967 938 S.W.2d 847Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 4, 1997 1. CIVIL PROCEDURE — DISMISSAL OF CAUSE NOT PERMITTED WHEN PENDING ACTION IS IN JURISDICTION SERVED BY COURTS OTHER THAN ARKANSAS COURTS. — When the pending action is in a jurisdiction […]

Read More

LOCKWOOD v. STATE, 249 Ark. 941 (1971)

SAUL LOCKWOOD v. STATE OF ARKANSAS ET AL No. 5428. 462 S.W.2d 465Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 1, 1971 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — SUNDAY CLOSING LAW — POLICE POWER, EXERCISE OF. — Sunday Closing Laws are valid as a proper exercise of the police power of the state. 2. STATUTES — GENERAL OR […]

Read More

FARGASON COMPANY v. DRIVER, 171 Ark. 315 (1926)

J. T. FARGASON COMPANY v. DRIVER. 284 S.W. 20Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered May 31, 1926. 1. APPEAL AND ERROR — HARMLESS ERROR — ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE. — The admission of improper evidence is not ground for reversal where the verdict of the jury shows that they disregarded it. 2. FACTORS — EVIDENCE AS […]

Read More

RAGAN v. VENHAUS, 289 Ark. 266 (1986)

James A. RAGAN, RILEY’S INC., On Behalf of Themselves and All Other Similarly Situated Taxpayers v. Donald VENHAUS, et al. No. 85-109. 711 S.W.2d 467Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 16, 1986 1. APPEAL ERROR — FAILURE OF APPELLANTS TO FILE STATEMENT OF POINTS TO BE RELIED UPON — NO PREJUDICE UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES — […]

Read More

GREEN v. STATE, 362 Ark. 459 (2005)

Billy Dale GREEN v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 04-1356. 209 S.W.3d 339Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered June 2, 2005. Rehearing denied September 8, 2005. 1. APPEAL ERROR — DENIAL OF ARK. R. CRIM. P. 26.1 MOTION — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.1 provides that once a plea of […]

Read More

MAAS v. CITY OF MOUNTAIN HOME, 338 Ark. 202 (1999)

CHARLES MAAS v. CITY OF MOUNTAIN HOME 98-1337 992 S.W.2d 105Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 17, 1999 1. JUDGMENT — SUMMARY JUDGMENT — WHEN APPROPRIATE. — Motions for summary judgment are governed by Ark. R. Civ. P. 56, which provides that a party may move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary […]

Read More

WILSON v. NEAL, 341 Ark. 282 (2000)

Jimmie L. WILSON v. James A. NEAL 99-103 16 S.W.3d 228Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 11, 2000 1. Appeal error — decision affirmed where majority of justices unable to agree on single ground for reversal — no precedential value. — Where a majority of the justices of the supreme court were unable to […]

Read More

POLLOCK v. HAMM, 177 Ark. 348 (1928)

POLLOCK v. HAMM. 6 S.W.2d 541Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 21, 1928. 1. DAMAGES — AWARD FOR PERSONAL INJURIES. — An award of $10,000 to a 26-year old girl for permanent injuries to her pelvis, resulting in shortening of a limb and producing a condition which may interfere with the normal process of […]

Read More

HUBBARD WILLIS v. STATE, 258 Ark. 472 (1975)

Frederick Lee HUBBARD and Richard WILLIS, Jr. v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 75-55. 527 S.W.2d 608Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 2, 1975 Rehearing denied October 6, 1975 1. TRIAL — EVIDENCE ELICITED BY PARTY MOVING TO STRIKE — ADMISSIBILITY. — It is not error for the trial court to refuse to exclude […]

Read More

JUMPER v. L M TRANSPORT. INC., 296 Ark. 319 (1988)

Kathy Wright JUMPER and BOB JUMPER v. L M TRANSPORTATION, INC. No. 88-46 756 S.W.2d 901Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 19, 1988 1. PRINCIPAL AGENT — DEFINITION OF AGENCY RELATIONSHIP. — The relation of agency is created as the result of conduct by two parties manifesting that one of them is willing for […]

Read More

MASTERSON v. STATE, 329 Ark. 443 (1997)

Donna M. MASTERSON and DG’s Shiloh Two, Inc. v. STATE of Arkansas ex rel. Winston Bryant, Attorney General 96-1064 949 S.W.2d 63Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered July 14, 1997 1. EQUITY — CHANCELLOR GENERALLY HAS NO CRIMINAL JURISDICTION — EXCEPTION TO GENERAL RULE THAT EQUITY WILL NOT ENJOIN COMMISSION OF CRIME WHEN REMEDY AT […]

Read More

MARKET PRODUCE COMPANY v. HOLLAND, 183 Ark. 711 (1931)

MARKET PRODUCE COMPANY v. HOLLAND. 38 S.W.2d 317Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 4, 1931. COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT — ACCEPTANCE OF CHECK IN FULL PAYMENT. — Where a check reciting that it was in settlement of an inclosed account, after a dispute as to the amount due, was accepted and cashed, the payee was […]

Read More

KOCH v. ADAMS, 09-829 (Ark. 5-6-2010)

Anthony KOCH, Appellant v. Nancy ADAMS and Danny Ebbs, Appellee 09-829Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 6, 2010 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Second Division. Appellees’ motion for costs pursuant to Rule 6-7 of the Rules of the Supreme Court is denied. Page 2

Read More

FOSTER v. DIRECTOR OF LABOR, 89 Ark. App. XXII (2005)

Foster v. Director of Labor. No. E 04-270.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. January 12, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Cases Affirmed by the Arkansas Court of Appeals without Written Opinion Pursuant To Rules-2(B).

Read More

HOFFMAN v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 2010 Ark. App. 856

Harley HOFFMAN, Appellant v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Minor Child, Appellees CA 10-826Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. Opinion Delivered December 15, 2010 Appeal from the Washington County Circuit Court, [No. JV 2009-108-3], Honorable Stacey Zimmerman, Judge, Affirmed. DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. Harley Hoffman appeals from a circuit-court order terminating his parental rights […]

Read More