VINCENNES STEEL CORPORATION v. DERRYBERRY. No. 4-4651 106 S.W.2d 571Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 17, 1937. 1. MASTER AND SERVANT. — In employee’s action against employer and coemployee for damages for the loss of an eye when a rod was struck knocking it through a hole causing the injury, held that, since the […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
MID-SOUTH ADJUSTMENT CO. v. ESTATE OF HARRIS, 87 Ark. App. 139 (2004)
MID-SOUTH ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC. v. The ESTATE OF Shanna Nicole HARRIS, Deceased. CA 03-1085. 189 S.W.3d 518Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered June 30, 2004. 1. PROBATE — PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE HAS STANDING TO BRING WRONGFUL-DEATH ACTION — OTHER BENEFICIARIES HAVE NO STANDING TO SUE. — The personal representative is clearly the party to bring […]
NICHOLS v. STATE, 273 Ark. 466 (1981)
Penelope Marcheta NICHOLS a/k/a SISTER PENNY v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 80-262. 620 S.W.2d 942Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 14, 1981 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — RIGHT TO COUNSEL — WAIVER. — An accused may voluntarily and intelligently waive her right to counsel and choose to represent herself. Held: Where, even after appellant […]
NICHOLS v. STATE, 171 Ark. 987 (1926)
NICHOLS v. STATE. 287 S.W. 190Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 18, 1926. 1. INTOXICATING LIQUORS — SALE IN BUILDING — INJUNCTION. — Under Crawford Moses’ Dig., 6196, declaring engaging in the sale of intoxicating liquors in a building to be a nuisance, and 6201, providing that such nuisance may be enjoined, held that […]
SYKES v. WILLIAMS, 373 Ark. 236 (2008)
David SYKES v. Jack WILLIAMS, First Coast Intermodal Services, Inc., and Baxter Healthcare Corporation. NO. 07-918. 283 S.W.3d 209Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered April 17, 2008. 1. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION — STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF PROVISIONS — Provisions of workers’ compensation law are to be strictly construed; strict construction is narrow construction and requires that nothing […]
PALMER v. DIRECTOR OF LABOR, 95 Ark. App. xxiv (2006)
Palmer v. Director of Labor. No. E 05-290.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. April 26, 2006. Opinion Pursuant to Rule 5-2(B), Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court. Affirmed.
ARKANSAS PROFESSIONAL BAIL BONDSMAN v. OUDIN, 348 Ark. 48 (2002)
ARKANSAS PROFESSIONAL BAIL BONDSMAN LICENSING BOARD, Appellants v. Marc OUDIN, Jr., and Bail Bond Financing, Inc., Appellees 01-782 69 S.W.3d 855Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 21, 2002 Petition for Rehearing Denied April 25, 2002. 1. Administrative law procedure — standard of review — role of courts. — In administrative matters, the appellate court’s […]
LIGON v. DUNKLIN, 360 Ark. XIX (2005)
Ligon v. Dunklin. No. 04-661.Supreme Court of Arkansas. February 10, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motion for Photocopy at Public Expense of Complaint for Disbarment and Final Order Pursuant to Freedom of Information Act denied.
MOW v. MOW, 66 Ark. App. 374 (1999)
Judith M. MOW v. William S. MOW CA98-1191 990 S.W.2d 578Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division III Opinion delivered May 26, 1999 1. Fraud — basis for setting aside judgment — requirements. — The fraud that entitles a party to impeach a judgment must be fraud extrinsic of the matter tried in the cause and […]
SAXTON v. ARK. GAZETTE CO. GRIFFEE, 264 Ark. 133 (1978)
John SAXTON v. ARKANSAS GAZETTE CO. and Carol GRIFFEE No. 78-19 569 S.W.2d 115Supreme Court of Arkansas (En Banc) Opinion delivered July 17, 1978 [Rehearing denied September 11, 1978.] 1. CIVIL PROCEDURE — DISCOVERY OF SOURCES OF INFORMATION OF NEWS REPORTER — DISCLOSURE PRIVILEGED UNDER APPLICABLE STATUTE. — A news reporter’s disclosure of sources of […]
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOC. v. DRAKE, 298 Ark. 287 (1989)
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION of Paragould v. David K. DRAKE, Bettye J. Drake, Bob Berry and Karin Berry No. 88-288 766 S.W.2d 617Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 20, 1989 APPEAL ERROR — NO APPEALABLE ORDER. — Where appellee’s motion for summary judgment was granted, but other defendants in the action remained and […]
ROEHM v. ARK. DEP’T, 99 Ark. App. xxv (2007)
Roehm v. Arkansas Dep’t of Health Human Servs. No. CA 07-289.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. September 5, 2007. MARSHALL, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication. affirmed.
HOWELL v. THEW SHOVEL CO., 184 Ark. 777 (1931)
HOWELL v. THEW SHOVEL COMPANY. 43 S.W.2d 366Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 23, 1931. 1. SALES — CONDITIONAL SALE. — A sale of machinery with reservation of title in the vendor until paid for is a conditional sale, and not a chattel mortgage. 2. SALES — CONDITIONAL SALE. — The purchaser of personal […]
ALLEN ENGINEERING CORP. v. GREEN, CA08-726 (Ark.App. 11-19-2008)
ALLEN ENGINEERING CORP. et al., Appellant v. Roy E. GREEN et al., Appellee CA08-726Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered November 19, 2008 Appeal from Workers’ Compensation Commission. Appellant’s motion for additional brief time.
HOFFMAN v. ARKANSAS DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, CA10-826 (Ark.App. 12-15-2010)
Harley HOFFMAN, Appellant v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Minor Child, Appellee CA10-826Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered December 15, 2010 Appeal from Washington Circuit. DAVID M. GLOVER, JUDGE: Affirmed. Vaught, C.J., and Hart, J., agree. Page 3
KING v. STATE, 97 Ark. App. VI (2006)
King v. State. No. CA CR 06-371.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. November 8, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] VAUGHT, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication affirmed.
CARRIGAN v. STATE, 326 Ark. 271 (1996)
James CARRIGAN v. STATE of Arkansas CR 96-353 929 S.W.2d 164Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 14, 1996 CONTEMPT — MOTION TO FILE BELATED BRIEF DENIED — SHOW-CAUSE ORDER ISSUED. — Where the clerk of the supreme court notified appellant’s attorney on September 12, 1996, that appellant’s brief was five months overdue, the attorney […]
MATTHEWS v. DIRECTOR, E08-94 (Ark.App. 9-17-2008)
Murtis MATTHEWS, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E08-94Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 17, 2008 The following cases are appeals from the Arkansas Board of Review. Page 7
WILSON v. STATE, 222 Ark. 452 (1953)
WILSON v. STATE No. 4748 261 S.W.2d 257Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 12, 1953. 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — AMENDMENT No. 14. — An attempt to circumvent the Amendment’s interdiction against local and special laws by confining the operation of a legislative Act to a county having a population of between 10,275 and 10,290, […]
SCHRADER v. SCHRADER, 81 Ark. App. 343 (2003)
Ronald SCHRADER v. Bruce SCHRADER, et al CA 02-677 101 S.W.3d 873Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. Opinion delivered April 2, 2003 1. APPEAL ERROR — CHANCERY CASES — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — Although chancery cases are reviewed de novo on the record, the appellate court does not reverse unless it determines that the […]