BRIGHAM v. LOCKE. No. 5-2386 345 S.W.2d 935Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 8, 1961. 1. DEED — SETTING ASIDE FOR GRANTOR’S MENTAL INCOMPETENCY. — A deed may be set aside for mental incompetence on the part of the grantor. 2. CANCELLATION OF INSTRUMENT — DEEDS, MENTAL INCOMPETENCY OF GRANTOR. — Chancellor’s cancellation of […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
FORT SMITH BUILDING LOAN ASSOCIATION v. HIGHT, 191 Ark. 415 (1935)
FORT SMITH BUILDING LOAN ASSOCIATION v. HIGHT. No. 4-3984 86 S.W.2d 923Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 14, 1935. 1. JUDGMENT — DEFAULT JUDGMENT. — Where the complaint in a mortgage. foreclosure suit alleged that a certain defendant had previously purchased the mortgaged property and agreed to assume the mortgage indebtedness, a personal judgment […]
BATTEN v. FERRELL GAS LP, CA06-1221 (Ark.App. 5-16-2007)
Norman Batten, Appellant v. Ferrell Gas LP, Appellee CA06-1221Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 16, 2007 Appeal from Workers’ Compensation Commission SUBMISSIONS Page 5
TRAVIS v. S. FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INS. CO., 10-1310 (Ark. 7-21-2011)
Barney TRAVIS et al., Appellant v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee 10-1310Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered July 21, 2011 Appeal from Craighead Circuit, Western District. MOTIONS SUBMITTED PETITION FOR REVIEW: Page 2
SCHUBERT v. TARGET STORES, INC., 10-349 (Ark. 11-18-2010)
Roger SCHUBERT, Appellant v. TARGET STORES, INC., Appellee 10-349Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 18, 2010 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Seventh Division. SUBMISSIONS Page 7
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. BYNUM, 183 Ark. 1100 (1931)
(1) NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BYNUM (2) WALKER v. BOYKIN. 40 S.W.2d 446Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 22, 1931. 1. INSURANCE — INSOLVENCY — CANCELLATION OF POLICY. — Where under Crawford Moses’ Dig., 5951, upon application of the Attorney General, the circuit court adjudged a fire insurance company to be insolvent […]
HOFFMAN v. SUSKIE, CA08-851 (Ark.App. 2-25-2009)
Harry HOFFMAN III, Appellant v. Schanesta SUSKIE, Appellee CA08-851Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 25, 2009 Appeal from Saline Circuit. Page 8
BALDWIN v. STATE, CR09-60 (Ark. 1-7-2010)
Charles Jason BALDWIN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR09-60Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered January 7, 2010 Appeal from Craighead Circuit, Western District. Appellant’s motion to stay appeal and to remand for consideration of new evidence of actual innocence is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Page 2
WALKER v. ADHS, 291 Ark. 43 (1987)
Deborah Lynn WALKER, ET AL. v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.; Don VENHAUS, et al. Intervenors No. 86-184. 722 S.W.2d 558Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 20, 1987 1. COURTS — NO PROVISION IN ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION FOR CREATION OF “JUVENILE COURT” OR FOR GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO ESTABLISH ONE. — Article 7, 1, […]
KLIMAS v. STATE, 271 Ark. 508 (1980)
Francis Edward KLIMAS v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 75-187. 609 S.W.2d 46Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered December 22, 1980 1. CRIMINAL LAW — SENTENCE PUNISHMENT BASED ON LAW EXISTING AT TIME OF OFFENSE. — The Criminal Code provides that an offense committed prior to the effective date of the Code shall be punished […]
LEWIS v. STATE, CACR11-341 (Ark.App. 4-27-2011)
Daniel LEWIS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR11-341Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 27, 2011 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Fourth Division. Motion and amended motion of Jack Kearney to be relieved as counsel for appellant and for appointment as appellate counsel are denied without prejudice. Page 1
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK v. FAUSETT INC., 222 Ark. 193 (1953)
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK v. FAUSETT CO., INC. No. 5-117 258 S.W.2d 48Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 25, 1953. 1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — ZONING ORDINANCES. — Appellee purchased all but two acres of a tract zoned for heavy industry, succeeded in having it rezoned for residence property, built some 85 residences on it, […]
SPAIN v. JEAN, 225 Ark. 106 (1955)
SPAIN v. JEAN No. 5-681 279 S.W.2d 283Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 23, 1955. ADVERSE POSSESSION — BOUNDARIES, ESTABLISHMENT OF BY — WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE. — Chancellor’s finding, based upon location of house, location of a large hedge and a rose trellis apparently indicating the line between the two lots, that […]
HILLARD v. STATE, 92 Ark. App. xx (2005)
Hillard v. State. No. CA CR 04-116.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. June 29, 2005. NEAL, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication affirmed.
SHAFFERS v. AR. D.H.H.S., CA07-377 (Ark.App. 10-3-2007)
LaKesha SHAFFERS, Appellant v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee CA07-377Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 3, 2007 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Eighth Division. MOTIONS SUBMITTED Motion of Jennifer Oyler Olson for attorney’s fees and expenses.
BAILEY v. STATE, 80 Ark. App. 193 (2002)
Edward Lee BAILEY, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CA 02-438 95 S.W.3d 811Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II and III. Opinion Delivered December 18, 2002 1. PROBATE — PROCEEDINGS — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — The appellate court reviews probate proceedings de novo and will not reverse the decision of the probate court unless […]
AMERICAN MED. INT’L, INC. v. ARK. BL. CR. BL. SH., 299 Ark. 514 (1989)
AMERICAN MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and St. Mary’s Hospital v. ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, A Mutual Insurance Co. No. 88-259 773 S.W.2d 831Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered July 17, 1989 [Rehearing denied September 11, 1989.] 1. APPEAL ERROR — ARGUMENTS RAISED FOR THE FIRST TIME ON APPEAL ARE NOT CONSIDERED. — Arguments made […]
CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. CARTER, 204 Ark. 295 (1942)
CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. CARTER. No. 4-6733 161 S.W.2d 746Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 11, 1942 1. APPEAL AND ERROR — SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE. — If the only question raised in motion for a new trial is whether defendant’s request for instructed verdict should have been given, and record discloses substantial evidence that […]
DIERKS v. STATE, CACR08-297 (Ark.App. 8-20-2008)
Wayne Alan DIERKS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-297Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered August 20, 2008 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Fourth Division. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is moot. Page 2
STYERS v. JOHNSON, 19 Ark. App. 312 (1986)
Elmer STYERS and Thelma STYERS v. Joe JOHNSON and Gladys JOHNSON, et al. No. CA 86-239 720 S.W.2d 334Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II Opinion delivered December 10, 1986 1. WATERS WATER COURSES — PERMIT TO BUILD DAM — LOWER RIPARIAN OWNERS PROTECTED. — Even though the appellants complied with the legal requirements necessary […]