SECOND INJURY TRUST FUND v. WHITE CONSOL., 317 Ark. 26 (1994)

SECOND INJURY TRUST FUND and Alonzo Rooney v. WHITE CONSOLIDATED and Continental Loss Adjusting 93-1311 875 S.W.2d 834Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 9, 1994 WORKERS’ COMPENSATION — “IMPAIRMENT” DEFINED — SECOND INJURY FUND LIABLE WHEN PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY RESULTS FROM SECOND INJURY — WORKER IMPAIRED IN FIRST INJURY BUT SUFFERED NO WAGE LOSS. […]

Read More

HOLT v. HOLT, 253 Ark. 456 (1972)

WANDA WOODS HOLT v. CARL G. HOLT No. 5-6076. 486 S.W.2d 688Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 20, 1972 1. DIVORCE — TERMINATION OF ALIMONY — PROCEEDINGS RELIEF. — A divorced husband must make proper application to the court having jurisdiction to obtain relief from the payment of alimony provided in the decree of […]

Read More

BOYD v. STATE, 13 Ark. App. 132 (1984)

Marvin BOYD v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 84-132 680 S.W.2d 911Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II Opinion delivered December 12, 1984 1. SEARCHES SEIZURES — WARRANT — COMMON SENSE TEST. — The magistrate issuing the warrant must make a practical, common sense decision based on all the circumstances set forth in the […]

Read More

PATRICK v. STATE, CACR10-73 (Ark.App. 8-25-2010)

Tracy PATRICK, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR10-73Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered August 25, 2010 Appeal from Crittenden Circuit. Motion of C. Brian Williams for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $1,400.00. Page 2

Read More

SANYO MFG. CORP. v. FARRELL, 16 Ark. App. 59 (1985)

SANYO MFG. CORP. v. Minnie Lou FARRELL No. CA 85-91. 696 S.W.2d 779Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I Opinion delivered October 2, 1985 1. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION — EMPLOYER MUST FURNISH EMPLOYEE MEDICAL SERVICES WITHIN REASONABLE TIME — ALTERNATIVE. — Ark. Stat. Ann. 81-1311 (Supp. 1985) requires that the employer shall promptly provide medical services […]

Read More

KEENAN v. WILLIAMS, CHANCELLOR, 225 Ark. 556 (1955)

KEENAN v. WILLIAMS, CHANCELLOR No. 5-768 283 S.W.2d 688Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 14, 1955. 1. DRAINS — JURISDICTION OF SUIT CHARGING MISMANAGEMENT. — Ark. Stats. 1947, 21-556, providing for an auditorial examination of the annual financial statements filed by drainage district in the office of county clerk held not to deprive taxpayer […]

Read More

MISHION v. STATE, CACR07-321 (Ark.App. 2-20-2008)

Ronald Lee MISHION, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR07-321Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 20, 2008 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Motion of David L. Dunagin for attorney’s fees. Page 5

Read More

FOWLER v. STATE, CR10-103 (Ark. 5-6-2010)

Antwan Lavan FOWLER, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR10-103Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 6, 2010 Appeal from Faulkner Circuit. Appellant’s motion to file supplemental brief. Page 3

Read More

HOME INS. CO. v. ALLIED TELEPHONE CO., 246 Ark. 1095 (1969)

HOME INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALLIED TELEPHONE COMPANY, et al No. 5-4897 442 S.W.2d 211Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 26, 1969. [Rehearing denied July 14, 1969.] 1. TRIAL — RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE — NECESSITY OF SPECIFIC OBJECTION. — A specific objection to the introduction of testimony because of failure to lay the proper foundation […]

Read More

ROGERS v. ROGERS, CA07-1217 (Ark.App. 3-5-2008)

Edmundo G. ROGERS, Appellant v. Cynthia Ann ROGERS, Appellee CA07-1217Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered March 5, 2008 Appeal from Benton Circuit. Appellant’s motion for additional time to file brief is granted. Final extension. Page 4

Read More

HARRIS v. THACKERY, 201 Ark. 881 (1941)

HARRIS v. THACKERY. No. 4-6195 147 S.W.2d 355Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 10, 1941. 1. ESTOPPEL. — One cannot, with knowledge of the facts, accept the benefits of a transaction without assuming its burdens, nor can one accept the benefits of a decree without admitting its legality. 2. ESTOPPEL — ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS […]

Read More

MADDEN v. DIRECTOR, E08-107 (Ark.App. 10-8-2008)

Henry E. MADDEN, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E08-107Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 8, 2008 The following cases appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review areaffirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(b). Page 4

Read More

COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. v. PRIDDY, 328 Ark. 94 (1997)

COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY v. PRIDDY 96-657 940 S.W.2d 497Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 7, 1997 APPEAL ERROR — CASES DECIDED WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT WHERE SCHEDULING WOULD CAUSE UNDUE DELAY — NO PROVISION FOR SCREENING CASES TO DETERMINE WHICH CASES PRESENT ISSUES FOR WHICH ORAL ARGUMENT SHOULD BE GRANTED — SCHEDULING FOR THIS ARGUMENT […]

Read More