TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HARTJE, JUDGE, 278 Ark. 320 (1983)

TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a MR. MOBILE HOMES and CENTURION HOMES CORPORATIONS v. George F. HARTJE, Judge, et al Nos. 82-191, 82-192 650 S.W.2d 559Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 7, 1983 [Rehearing denied March 14, 1983.] 1. PROHIBITION — WHEN SUPREME COURT MAY ISSUE WRIT. — When a trial court is proceeding in a […]

Read More

DUPREE v. ALMA SCHOOL DIST. NO. 30, 279 Ark. 340 (1983)

Jim DuPREE et al v. ALMA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 30 of Crawford County et al No. 82-175 651 S.W.2d 90Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 31, 1983 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — EDUCATION CLAUSE REINFORCES APPLICATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE TO PRESENT EDUCATION FINANCING SYSTEM. — The constitutional mandate for a general, suitable and efficient […]

Read More

ROSWELL v. DRIVER, 268 Ark. 819 (1980)

David Patrick ROSWELL v. John B. DRIVER and Frances R. DRIVER No. CA 79-112 596 S.W.2d 352Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 12, 1980 Rehearing Denied April 9, 1980 Released for publication April 9, 1980 1. PARTITION — FAILURE TO PROPERLY SERVE DEFENDANT — COURT WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO PARTITION LAND. — Where the […]

Read More

SPECIAL INS. SERVICES INC. v. ADAMSON, 20 Ark. App. 8 (1987)

SPECIAL INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. and ARKANSAS GENERAL AGENCY, INC. v. DIXIE ADAMSON No. CA 86-43. 722 S.W.2d 875Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II Opinion delivered February 4, 1987 1. EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — The findings of fact of a trial judge sitting as the finder of fact will not be […]

Read More

HALL v. GRIFFIN, CR09-713 (Ark. 11-12-2009)

Tommy HALL, Appellant v. Honorable Joe GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge, Appellee CR09-713Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered November 12, 2009 Appeal from Miller Circuit. Pro se motion for reconsideration is denied. Page 3

Read More

McCLARD v. CRAIN MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., 313 Ark. 472 (1993)

James McCLARD, Brian Stacks, and Joyce Stacks v. CRAIN MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., d/b/a Freeway Ford Lincoln, Mercury, Inc. 92-1325 855 S.W.2d 929Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 21, 1993 [Rehearing denied July 19, 1993[*] ] [*] Hays and Glaze, JJ., would grant rehearing. 1. JURY — MODEL INSTRUCTION ACCURATE — SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN […]

Read More

THOMAS v. HAWKINS, 217 Ark. 787 (1950)

THOMAS v. HAWKINS No. 4-9403 233 S.W.2d 247Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 23, 1950. TRIAL — ELECTION CONTESTS — NECESSITY FOR VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT BY AFFIDAVIT — SUFFICIENCY OF ATTESTATION. — In controversy involving jurisdiction of trial court to hear an election contest, admittedly filed within apt time, it was contended that the […]

Read More

JACKSON v. SMITH BLAIR, 2010 Ark. App. 691

Charlie L. JACKSON, Appellant v. SMITH BLAIR, INC. and Travelers Indemnity Company, Appellees CA 10-539Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion Delivered October 20, 2010 Appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission, [F506113], Affirmed. RITA W. GRUBER, Judge. Charlie Jackson appeals the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision of April 30, 2010, denying his claim for […]

Read More

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SHANE, 98 Ark. 132 (1911)

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SHANE Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion Delivered March 6, 1911 1. LIFE INSURANCE — WARRANTY — USE OF LIQUORS. — Where an application for life insurance, which was made a warranty, stated that the applicant did not “use” intoxicating liquors, it was not error to instruct the jury that the […]

Read More

W. L. DOUGLAS SHOE CO. v. ROLLWAGE, 187 Ark. 1084 (1933)

W. L. DOUGLAS SHOE COMPANY v. ROLLWAGE. No. 4-3162 63 S.W.2d 841Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 23, 1933. 1. ATTORNEY AND CLIENT — NEGLIGENCE IN MAKING COLLECTION. — The fact that an attorney erroneously believed that the law prohibited the issuance of a grit of garnishment before obtaining judgment did not excuse his […]

Read More

POLK v. STATE, 82 Ark. App. 210 (2003)

Raymond POLK v. STATE of Arkansas CA CR 02-1264 105 S.W.3d 797Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion delivered May 21, 2003 1. APPEAL ERROR — SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE — CONSIDERED FIRST ON APPEAL. — Double-jeopardy issues require consideration of a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence prior to the examination of other […]

Read More

KITTRELL v. WILKERSON, 177 Ark. 1174 (1928)

KITTRELL v. WILKERSON. 9 S.W.2d 788Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 8, 1928. 1. AUTOMOBILE — NEGLIGENCE — QUESTION FOR JURY. — Whether the driver of an automobile which collided with another car while attempting to pass it was negligent held, in view of conflicting evidence, to be a question for the jury. 2. […]

Read More

DAVENPORT v. LEE, 349 Ark. 113 (2002)

Ron and Ramona DAVENPORT, as the Administrators of the Estate of Linda Kay Moore, Deceased, or, in the Alternative, Ron and Ramona Davenport, Individually and as the Heirs at Law of Linda Kay Moore, Deceased, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Heirs at Law of the Deceased, or All Who are Entitled to Legal […]

Read More

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TEL. CO. v. ROBERTS, 182 Ark. 211 (1930)

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. ROBERTS. 31 S.W.2d 302Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 22, 1930. 1. AUTOMOBILE — NEGLIGENCE — JURY QUESTION. — Evidence of negligence of driver of automobile held for the jury. 2. AUTOMOBILE — JURY QUESTION. — Whether in striking a pedestrian, the driver of an automobile was engaged in […]

Read More

SCAMARDO v. SPARKS REG’L MED. CTR., 375 Ark. 300 (2008)

June D. SCAMARDO v. SPARKS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. No. 08-820.Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered December 19, 2008. 1. APPEAL ERROR — DOCTRINE OF THE LAW OF THE CASE — EXCEPTION TO DOCTRINE AROSE IN THE CONTEXT OF OVERRULED DECISION. — The law of the case doctrine prohibits a court from reconsidering issues of law […]

Read More