TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HARTJE, JUDGE, 278 Ark. 320 (1983)

TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a MR. MOBILE HOMES and CENTURION HOMES CORPORATIONS v. George F. HARTJE, Judge, et al Nos. 82-191, 82-192 650 S.W.2d 559Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 7, 1983 [Rehearing denied March 14, 1983.] 1. PROHIBITION — WHEN SUPREME COURT MAY ISSUE WRIT. — When a trial court is proceeding in a […]

Read More

DUPREE v. ALMA SCHOOL DIST. NO. 30, 279 Ark. 340 (1983)

Jim DuPREE et al v. ALMA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 30 of Crawford County et al No. 82-175 651 S.W.2d 90Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 31, 1983 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — EDUCATION CLAUSE REINFORCES APPLICATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE TO PRESENT EDUCATION FINANCING SYSTEM. — The constitutional mandate for a general, suitable and efficient […]

Read More

ROSWELL v. DRIVER, 268 Ark. 819 (1980)

David Patrick ROSWELL v. John B. DRIVER and Frances R. DRIVER No. CA 79-112 596 S.W.2d 352Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 12, 1980 Rehearing Denied April 9, 1980 Released for publication April 9, 1980 1. PARTITION — FAILURE TO PROPERLY SERVE DEFENDANT — COURT WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO PARTITION LAND. — Where the […]

Read More

SPECIAL INS. SERVICES INC. v. ADAMSON, 20 Ark. App. 8 (1987)

SPECIAL INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. and ARKANSAS GENERAL AGENCY, INC. v. DIXIE ADAMSON No. CA 86-43. 722 S.W.2d 875Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II Opinion delivered February 4, 1987 1. EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — The findings of fact of a trial judge sitting as the finder of fact will not be […]

Read More

HALL v. GRIFFIN, CR09-713 (Ark. 11-12-2009)

Tommy HALL, Appellant v. Honorable Joe GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge, Appellee CR09-713Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered November 12, 2009 Appeal from Miller Circuit. Pro se motion for reconsideration is denied. Page 3

Read More

McCASTLAIN v. R B TOBACCO CO., 242 Ark. 74 (1967)

Mrs. Doris McCASTLAIN, Comm. v. R. B. TOBACCO CO. No. 5-4140 411 S.W.2d 882Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 6, 1967 1. STATUTES — REGULATIONS GOVERNING LICENSING OF CIGARETTE DEALERS — CONSTRUCTION OPERATION. — Rules and regulations issued by State Revenue Commissioner under provisions of Ark. Stat. Ann. 84-2325 for the administration of the […]

Read More

ROBINSON v. ROBINSON, 323 Ark. 224 (1996)

Harry G. ROBINSON, Jr., and Miriam Robinson v. Heather Renee ROBINSON 95-763 914 S.W.2d 292Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered January 29, 1996 1. TORTS — PARENTAL-IMMUNITY DOCTRINE — DOCTRINE APPLICABLE WHERE APPELLANT WAS UNEMANCIPATED MINOR AT TIME OF ALLEGED TORT. — A willful tort committed by a parent against his child is beyond the […]

Read More

SANDERS v. STATE, 326 Ark. 415 (1996)

Christopher SANDERS v. STATE of Arkansas 96-484 932 S.W.2d 315Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 28, 1996 1. JUVENILES — MOTION TO TRANSFER TO JUVENILE COURT — BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENCE REQUIRED. — The law regarding motions to transfer to juvenile court is well established; a defendant seeking a transfer has the burden […]

Read More

PERDUE v. ROYSE, 215 Ark. 110 (1949)

PERDUE v. ROYSE. No. 4-8722 219 S.W.2d 434Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 11, 1949. 1. APPEAL AND ERROR — INSUFFICIENCY OF ABSTRACT. — Since appellant’s abstract contains only the two instructions given by the court which appellant thought to be erroneous and it cannot, without search of the transcript, be known whether the […]

Read More

BOUNDS v. TRAVELERS INS. CO., 242 Ark. 787 (1967)

C. R. BOUNDS et ux v. TRAVELERS INS. CO. No. 5-4237 416 S.W.2d 298Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 5, 1967 [Rehearing denied July 26, 1967.] 1. JUDGMENT — MATTERS CONCLUDED — CONCLUSIVENESS OF ADJUDICATION. — Where in a prior suit service station operator was held to be a bailee rather than agent or […]

Read More

McELROY v. STATE, CR11-981 (Ark. 11-10-2011)

Ryan McELROY, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR11-981Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 10, 2011 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Seventh Division. PER CURIAM ORDER PETITION FOR REVIEW: Petition for review was denied today in the following case. Page 1

Read More

DUFFIELD v. DUFFIELD, 90 Ark. App. XVII (2005)

Duffield v. Duffield. No. CA 04-796.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. March 16, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] GLADWIN, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication reversed and remanded.

Read More

IN RE APPT. TO SUP. CT. COM. ON AUTO., 343 Ark. Appx. 880 (2001)

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON AUTOMATION Supreme Court of Arkansas January 25, 2001 PER CURIAM. Reed R. Edwards, Esq., of Little Rock is hereby appointed to the Committee on Automation for a three-year term to expire on October 31, 2003. Margaret M. Newton, attorney-at-law, of Little Rock is reappointed to the Automation […]

Read More

COLLINS v. LENNOX INDUSTRIES, INC., 77 Ark. App. 303 (2002)

Willie COLLINS, Appellant v. LENNOX INDUSTRIES, INC.; American Motorist Insurance Co., Appellee CA 01-1109 75 S.W.3d 204Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion Delivered May 8, 2002 1. Workers’ compensation — standard of review — substantial evidence defined. — On appeal, the appellate court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in […]

Read More

THOMAS v. STATE, 289 Ark. 72 (1986)

Odis Donell THOMAS v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 85-195. 709 S.W.2d 83Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 19, 1986 1. JURORS — RANDOM SELECTION OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS FROM LIST OF REGISTERED VOTERS — NO INTENTIONAL EXCLUSION OF BLACKS FROM JURY PANELS. — Ark. Stat. Ann. 39-205.1 (Supp. 1985) provides for the random selection […]

Read More

MARTIN v. BOBO, CA08-651 (Ark.App. 3-18-2009)

A.G. “Bud” MARTIN, Jr., Appellant v. Guy BOBO and Nellie Bobo, Appellee CA08-651Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 18, 2009 Appeal from Hempstead Circuit. Appellee’s motion to consider belated motion for extension of time to response to petition for rehearing and/or to consider belated response to petition for rehearing is granted. Page 6

Read More