Jamie Leigh JONES, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CA CR 10-588Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion Delivered January 26, 2011 Appeal from the Washington County Circuit Court, [NO. CR2009-1519-I], Honorable William A. Storey, Judge, Reversed and Remanded. RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge. Jamie Leigh Jones entered a conditional guilty plea to the crime […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
GRIMES v. JONES, 193 Ark. 858 (1937)
GRIMES v. JONES. No. 4-4572 103 S.W.2d 359Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered March 29, 1937. 1. JUDGMENT — ADOPTION ORDER. — Judgment in a special statutory proceeding for the adoption of a child is void and may be attacked collaterally, where neither the judgment as entered nor the petition for adoption states the child […]
YOCUM v. STATE, CACR10-830 (Ark.App. 1-26-2011)
Jimmy G. YOCUM, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR10-830Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered January 26, 2011 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. MOTIONS SUBMITTED Motion of James E. Hensley, Jr., for attorney’s fees. Page 6
STEPHENS v. LEDGERWOOD, 216 Ark. 404 (1950)
STEPHENS v. LEDGERWOOD No. 4-9034 226 S.W.2d 587Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 16, 1950. Rehearing denied February 20, 1950. 1. DEEDS — ERROR IN DESCRIPTION — EFFECT ON IMMEDIATE PARTIES. — A and B inherited lands from their father. A conveyed to her brother, B, whose wife was C. In 1931 B and […]
EDWARDS v. STATE, CR11-497 (Ark. 6-2-2011)
Stephen EDWARDS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR11-497Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered June 2, 2011 Appeal from Van Buren Circuit. PER CURIAM ORDERS Pro se motion for belated appeal of judgment of conviction. Motion dismissed. Page 1
McCOURT MANUFACTURING CORP. v. RYCROFT, CA07-1182 (Ark. 2-21-2008)
McCOURT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Appellant v. Dave RYCROFT, Appellee CA07-1182Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 21, 2008 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Appellee’s motion for reassignment to the Arkansas Supreme Court is denied. Page 3
GLOBAL ECONOMIC RESO. v. SABARE SCM SOLU., 2010 Ark. App. 139
GLOBAL ECONOMIC RESOURCES, Inc., Appellant v. SABARE SCM SOLUTION, Inc., Appellee CA 09-959Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion Delivered February 11, 2010 Appeal from the Benton County Circuit Court, [CV-2008-3008-3], Honorable Jay T. Finch, Judge, Dismissed. DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. Appellant, Global Economic Resources, Inc., brought an action for breach of contract in […]
ROWLAND v. ROGERS, 199 Ark. 1041 (1940)
ROWLAND v. ROGERS. No. 4-5774 137 S.W.2d 246Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 19, 1940. 1. HABEAS CORPUS — PROVINCE OF THE WRIT. — When a petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is in custody under process regular on its face, nothing will be inquired into except the jurisdiction of the court whence the […]
CARTER v. STATE, 295 Ark. 218 (1988)
Sanders McDaniel CARTER v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 87-209 748 S.W.2d 127Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 18, 1988 1. EVIDENCE — EVIDENCE OF OTHER CRIMES FACTORS FOR ADMISSION. — Under A.R.E. Rules 404(b) and 403, evidence of other crimes will be admitted only if it has independent relevance and its Page 219 […]
LR SCHOOL DIST. v. CELOTEX CORP., 264 Ark. 757 (1978)
THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT of Pulaski County, Arkansas v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al No. 78-137 574 S.W.2d 669Supreme Court of Arkansas (En Banc) Opinion delivered December 18, 1978 [Supplemental Order on Petition for Rehearing Granted in Part and Denied in Part, February 19, 1979.] 1. SALES — EMPRESS WARRANTY — INFERENCE OF EXPRESS WARRANTY […]
HUBANKS v. BAUGHMAN, CA09-126 (Ark.App. 9-2-2009)
Lisa M. HUBANKS, Appellant v. William D. BAUGHMAN, Appellee CA09-126Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 2, 2009 Appeal from Jefferson Circuit. PER CURIAM ORDERS Page 4
RUNYAN v. COMMUNITY FUND OF LITTLE ROCK, 182 Ark. 441 (1930)
RUNYAN v. COMMUNITY FUND OF LITTLE ROCK. 31 S.W.2d 743Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 20, 1930. 1. EVIDENCE — NOTICE BY MAIL — PRESUMPTION. — No presumption would arise that defendant received notice sent by mail unless they were properly addressed and deposited in the mail. 2. PRINCIPAL AND AGENT — RATIFICATION. — […]
CITIZENS PROTECTING MAUMELLE WATERSHED v. PROCTOR, 08-461 (Ark. 6-5-2008)
CITIZENS PROTECTING MAUMELLE WATERSHED et al., Appellant v. Honorable Willard PROCTOR, Jr., Circuit Judge, Appellee 08-461Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered June 5, 2008 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Fifth Division. Appellees’ motion to dismiss appeal or, in the alternative, to enforce order for supersedeas bond. Page 4
MARMOLEJO v. STATE, CR08-636 (Ark. 10-2-2008)
Ruben MARMOLEJO, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR08-636Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 2, 2008 MOTIONS SUBMITTED Appeal from Benton Circuit. PETITIONS FOR REVIEW: Page 1
L W JANITORIAL, INC. v. WILLIAMS, CA08-571 (Ark.App. 1-28-2009)
L W JANITORIAL, INC. v. Pearline WILLIAMS CA08-571Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered January 28, 2009 Appeal from Workers’ Compensation Commission. Page 7
SNODGRASS v. POCAHONTAS, 189 Ark. 819 (1934)
SNODGRASS v. POCAHONTAS No. 4-3691 75 S.W.2d 223Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 22, 1934. 1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — WATERWORKS — ACTS AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION. — Acts 1933, No. 134, authorizing cities to construct waterworks systems and improvements, held constitutional except as to the provisions exempting bonds from taxation. 2. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — WATERWORKS. — […]
WILLIAMS v. STATE, CR06-1362 (Ark. 1-4-2007)
ALAN D. WILLIAMS v. STATE OF ARKANSAS CR06-1362Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered January 4, 2007 Appeal from Miller Circuit Reviews Denied: Petitions for review were denied today in the following cases.
CLARK v. STATE, 94 Ark. App. 5 (2006)
Mario CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CA CR 02-975. 223 S.W.3d 66Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered January 18, 2006. 1. CRIMINAL LAW — THE TRIAL COURT VIOLATED ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-89-125(e) (1987). — The trial court violated Ark. Code Ann. § 16-89-125(e) (1987) when it answered questions from the jury during […]
INGRAM v. STATE, CACR09-102 (Ark.App. 10-7-2009)
Michelle Lee INGRAM, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR09-102Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered October 7, 2009 Appeal from Benton Circuit. Page 7
PINDER v. STATE, 356 Ark. xix (2004)
Pinder v. State CR 02-1289Supreme Court of Arkansas. February 19, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal denied.