HANCOCK v. STATE. No. 4244 161 S.W.2d 198Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 27, 1942 1. ARSON — PRESUMPTIONS — There is no presumption that an unexplained fire is of incendiary origin. 2. ARSON — PRESUMPTIONS. — The presumption is that an unexplained fire was caused by an accident, and, at least, that it […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
KELLEY v. STATE, 278 Ark. 497 (1983)
Terry KELLEY v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 83-21 646 S.W.2d 703Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 28, 1983 Guy H. “Mutt” Jones, Phil Stratton and Casey Jones, by: Phil Stratton, for petitioner. Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Arnold M. Jochums, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. PER CURIAM. Petition for Review is denied. PURTLE, […]
ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. OWENS, 252 Ark. 773 (1972)
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LANIE SUE ORMAND ET AL No. 5-5928 480 S.W.2d 939Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 5, 1972 1. INSURANCE — ACTIONS ON POLICIES — STATUTORY PENALTY ATTORNEY’S FEE. — Statutory penalty and attorney’s fee could not be assessed in an action on a policy issued in another state to a […]
SHIPMAN v. PENNEY, 268 Ark. 1096 (1980)
Majel Penney SHIPMAN v. D. R. (Runyan) PENNEY and wife, Tommye PENNEY No. CA 79-316 598 S.W.2d 450Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 23, 1980 Released for publication May 14, 1980 1. APPEAL ERROR — APPEAL FROM CHANCERY DECREE REVIEWED DE NOVO — DECREE AFFIRMED IF SUPPORTED BY PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE. — […]
COBB v. STATE, 340 Ark. 240 (2000)
Louis Kenjuan COBB v. STATE of Arkansas CR 99-631 12 S.W.3d 195Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 27, 2000 1. MOTIONS — DIRECTED VERDICT — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — On appeal, a motion for a directed verdict is treated as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence; when the supreme court reviews a […]
HARWOOD v. MONROE, 65 Ark. App. 57 (1999)
John S. HARWOOD v. Pamela MONROE, Special Administratrix of the Estate of George Wood, Deceased CA 98-159 984 S.W.2d 93Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division IV Opinion delivered January 27, 1999 1. EXECUTORS ADMINISTRATORS — ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR — NO APPEAL FROM. — Although appeal of an order of the probate court is allowed […]
WOOLFORD v. STATE, 202 Ark. 1010 (1941)
WOOLFORD v. STATE. No. 4223 155 S.W.2d 339Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 20, 1941. 1. CRIMINAL LAW — CORROBORATION OF ACCOMPLICE. — Where the defendant, charged with sodomy, enticed a fourteen-year-old boy to a place of seclusion and detained him against his will, testimony of the subject of the assailant’s lust need not […]
LAGRONE v. STATE, 90 Ark. App. 183 (2005)
Clarence LAGRONE v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CA CR 04-415. 204 S.W.3d 568Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered March 2, 2005. 1. MOTIONS — GRANT OR DENIAL OF MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — The appellate court reviews the grant or denial of a motion for continuance under an abuse of discretion […]
SMITH v. ST. PAUL FIRE MARINE INS., 76 Ark. App. 264 (2001)
KELLY SMITH, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF LYDIA SHEPARD, APPELLANT v. ST. PAUL FIRE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE CA 01-488 64 S.W.3d 764Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division III Opinion delivered December 19, 2001 1. Judgment — summary judgment — when granted. — Summary judgment is a remedy that should only be granted when there are no […]
DROWN v. WHITE RIVER LEVEE DISTRICT, 181 Ark. 629 (1930)
DROWN v. WHITE RIVER LEVEE DISTRICT. 27 S.W.2d 793Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 21, 1930. 1. APPEAL AND ERROR — WAIVER OF OBJECTION TO CONTINUANCE. — A party not objecting to a ruling granting a continuance unless an absent witness’ testimony should be agreed to, and consenting that the statement as to what […]
WEAVER v. TYSON FOODS, 31 Ark. App. 147 (1990)
MICHAEL WEAVER v. TYSON FOODS and SECOND INJURY FUND No. CA 88-436 790 S.W.2d 442Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 6, 1990. 1. STATUTES — CONSTRUCTION — PRIMARY RULE. — The primary rule in construing a statute is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the General Assembly and this intent […]
GILLESPIE v. GILLESPIE, CA08-679 (Ark.App. 2-4-2009)
Forrest F. GILLESPIE, Appellant v. Sabrena R. GILLESPIE, Appellee CA08-679Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 4, 2009 Appeal from Mississippi Circuit, Chickasawba District. SUBMISSIONS Page 7
WILSON v. RODGERS, 250 Ark. 335 (1971)
J. B. WILSON v. JOAN RODGERS et al No. 5-5415. 468 S.W.2d 739Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 5, 1971 [Rehearing granted June 21, 1971.] 1. TRUSTS — CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS — ESTABLISHMENT BY PAROL EVIDENCE. — A constructive trust may be proved by parol evidence but parol evidence for that purpose is received with […]
PENNINO v. WALTHALL, CA05-328 (Ark.App. 4-12-2006)
Kathleen PENNINO, Special Administratrix of the Estate of Sam Edward Walthall, and Samuel and Lily Walthall, Appellants, v. Bennie WALTHALL, Maryse Walthall, Clayton Land Timber Enterprises, and Walthall Bros. Investment, Inc., Appellees CA05-328Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. Opinion Delivered April 12, 2006 An Appeal from Ouachita County Circuit Court; No. P-2001-176; Honorable Edward […]
DUMBROSKI v. STATE, 192 Ark. 263 (1936)
DUMBROSKI v. STATE. No. CR 3981 90 S.W.2d 973Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered February 17, 1936. 1. HUSBAND AND WIFE — ABANDONMENT. — In a prosecution of a husband for abandoning his wife and child, it was error to read to the jury as the law of the case Crawford Moses’ Dig., 2596, where […]
SETTLE v. MEYERS, 251 Ark. 532 (1971)
RUTH MEYERS SETTLE v. RONALD P. MEYERS No. 5-5741. 473 S.W.2d 434Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered December 6, 1971 1. DIVORCE — CUSTODY OR CHILDREN — GROUNDS FOR AWARD. — A mother is better fitted than a father to take care of a very young child — especially a girl. 2. DIVORCE — MODIFICATION […]
MARIN-MENDEZ v. STATE, CACR09-291 (Ark.App. 12-16-2009)
Jose E. MARIN-MENDEZ et al., Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR09-291Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered December 16, 2009 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Motion of Charles E. Smith for attorney’s fees for appellant Mendez is granted. Allowed $1,400.00. Page 5
LIGON v. McCULLOUGH, 04-1395 (Ark. 10-30-2008)
Stark LIGON, As Executive Director of the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, Appellant v. R.S. McCULLOUGH, Appellee 04-1395Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 30, 2008 Appeal from Committee on Professional Conduct. Respondentappellant’s notice of objection to designation is denied. Page 3
PURDY v. LITTLE ROCK, 92 Ark. App. xxii (2005)
Purdy v. Little Rock Sch. Dist. No. CA 05-46.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. September 7, 2005. NEAL, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication affirmed.
OCKERMAN v. STATE, CR10-1012 (Ark. 10-28-2010)
David OCKERMAN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR10-1012Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 28, 2010 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, First Division. Motion for rule on clerk is granted. See per curiam this date. Page 3