CRAWFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. SCHABERG SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 69. No. 4-2726 53 S.W.2d 995Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 7, 1932. SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS — CONSOLIDATION. — Under Acts 1931, No. 169, 44, providing that no existing school district shall be included in a new district unless a majority of the […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
ROBERTS CO. v. SERGIO, 22 Ark. App. 58 (1987)
ROBERTS AND COMPANY, INC. v. Francesco SERGIO and Giovanni SERGIO, d/b/a PIAZZA SERGIO No. CA 86-167 733 S.W.2d 420Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I Opinion delivered July 22, 1987 1. JUDGES — DUTY TO INSTRUCT JURY ON LAW. — The trial judge is under a duty to instruct the jury as to the law […]
TUCKER v. PEACOCK, 216 Ark. 598 (1950)
TUCKER v. PEACOCK No. 4-9029 227 S.W.2d 929Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 13, 1950. Rehearing denied April 10, 1950. 1. CONTRACTS. — In appellant’s action to recover certain land and a bank account on the allegation the owner thereof orally agreed in his lifetime that if she would move into the house and […]
JOYNER v. STATE, 366 Ark. xx (2006)
Joyner v. State. No. CR 04-1208.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 25, 2006. PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motion for Rule on Clerk denied.
PURDY v. LITTLE ROCK, 92 Ark. App. xxii (2005)
Purdy v. Little Rock Sch. Dist. No. CA 05-46.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. September 7, 2005. NEAL, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication affirmed.
OCKERMAN v. STATE, CR10-1012 (Ark. 10-28-2010)
David OCKERMAN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR10-1012Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 28, 2010 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, First Division. Motion for rule on clerk is granted. See per curiam this date. Page 3
GRUBBS v. CREDIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO., 328 Ark. 142 (1997)
Wiley GRUBBS v. CREDIT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY 96-889 942 S.W.2d 249Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 14, 1997 ATTORNEY CLIENT — MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES ON APPEAL DENIED — AWARD PREMATURE. — The supreme court concluded that an award of attorneys’ fees before recovery against the insurer under the policy was premature, there having […]
TAYLOR v. STATE, CACR08-1501 (Ark.App. 9-9-2009)
Travis D. TAYLOR, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-1501Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 9, 2009 Appeal from Crittenden Circuit. Page 6
EDWARDS v. STATE, 2010 Ark. 85
Jeffery EDWARDS a/k/a Jeffrey Edwards, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee 09-1293Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 18, 2010 Pro se Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief [Circuit Court of Lee County, CV 2009-162, Hon. Richard Proctor, Judge], Appeal Dismissed; Motion Moot. PER CURIAM. Appellant Jeffery Edwards, who is also known […]
WICKHAM v. STATE, CACR08-1309 (Ark.App. 4-29-2009)
Larry WICKHAM, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-1309Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 29, 2009 Appeal from Marion Circuit.
GRAHAM v. DANIELS, 269 Ark. 774 (1980)
Roger GRAHAM v. Charles L. DANIELS, Director of Labor, and CARGILL, Inc. No. CA 79-374 601 S.W.2d 229Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 18, 1980 Released for publication July 8, 1980 1. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY — VOLUNTARY UNEMPLOYMENT DUE TO RESPIRATORY DISEASE — PRESERVATION OF JOB RIGHTS. — Where claimant worked in appellee’s floor […]
ELLIS v. STATE, 276 Ark. 560 (1982)
Vester Mae ELLIS v. STATE of Arkansas 637 S.W.2d 588Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered July 12, 1982 1. APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING MOTION. — Where an attorney for a criminal defendant attaches an affidavit to a motion for a belated appeal and concedes that it was […]
HILL v. STATE, 65 Ark. App. 131 (1999)
Danny Lee HILL v. STATE of Arkansas CA CR 98-830 985 S.W.2d 342Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II Opinion delivered February 17, 1999 1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — REVOCATION HEARING — DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO DUE PROCESS. — Although in a revocation hearing a defendant is not entitled to the full panoply of rights that attend […]
MARX v. HURON LITTLE ROCK, 88 Ark. App. 284 (2004)
Carol MARX v. HURON LITTLE ROCK d/b/a Hilton Inn-Little Rock. No. CA 04-246. 198 S.W.3d 127Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered November 10, 2004. 1. MOTIONS — DENIAL OF MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — When reviewing a denial of a motion for directed verdict, the appellate court determines whether the […]
JOHNSON v. BRASFIELD, 2010 Ark. App. 321
Glayton JOHNSON, Appellant v. Jerry BRASFIELD, Appellee CA 09-1255Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. Opinion Delivered April 14, 2010 Appeal from the Jefferson County Circuit Court, [CV-2006-542-1-5], Honorable Jodi Raines Dennis, Judge, Reversed and Remanded. DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. On December 28, 1976, appellant, Glayton Johnson, purchased “Lot 13” by warranty deed from the […]
GRAHAM CONSTRUCTION CO. v. EARL, 362 Ark. 220 (2005)
GRAHAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Roscoe T. EARL. No. 04-769. 208 S.W.3d 106Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered May 5, 2005. 1. APPEAL ERROR — BENCH TRIAL — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — Findings of fact of a trial court sitting as a jury will not be reversed on appeal unless clearly against a preponderance of […]
WILLIAMS v. STATE, 186 Ark. 738 (1933)
WILLIAMS v. STATE. No. CR 3827 55 S.W.2d 928Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 9, 1933. 1. JURY — EXAMINATION AS TO CONSCIENTIOUS SCRUPLES. — On trial of a capital case, it was not error to permit the prosecuting attorney to ask jurors upon their voir dire whether they had any conscientious scruples against […]
YOUNG v. STATE, CR07-378 (Ark. 9-6-2007)
William YOUNG, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR07-378Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered September 6, 2007 Appeal from Sharp Circuit. Appellant’s motion to substitute a corrected brief is granted. Page 3
PIERCE v. PIERCE, 268 Ark. 864 (1980)
Gerald Dale PIERCE v. Margie PIERCE (ORTNER) No. CA 79-25 596 S.W.2d 364Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 19, 1980 Released for publication April 9, 1980 1. DIVORCE — CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS — SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION UPON CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES. — The Chancery Court has the unquestioned power to alter the allowance of […]
RUDD v. STATE, 76 Ark. App. 121 (2001)
CARL RUDD, APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLEE CA CR 01-431 61 S.W.3d 885Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division III Opinion delivered December 5, 2001 [Petition for rehearing denied January 9, 2002.] 1. Evidence — sufficiency of — considered first on appeal. — The appellate court considers sufficiency of the evidence before addressing other alleged […]