HARRIS v. STATE, CR07-1247 (Ark. 1-17-2008)

Eddy Stanley HARRIS, Jr., Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR07-1247Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered January 17, 2008 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Fourth Division. Motion to practice by comity pursant to rule XIV of the rules governing admission to the bar. Page 6

Read More

DELANCY v. STATE, 356 Ark. 259 (2004)

Stanley K. DELANCY v. STATE of Arkansas CR 03-615 151 S.W.3d 301Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered February 26, 2004 1. APPEAL ERROR — MOOTNESS — MOOT ISSUES GENERALLY NOT REVIEWED. — As a general rule, the appellate courts of this state will not review issues that are moot; to do so would be to […]

Read More

EDWARDS v. EDWARDS, CA08-962 (Ark.App. 7-29-2009)

Richard Leon EDWARDS, Appellant v. Carol Lynn EDWARDS, Appellee CA08-962Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered July 29, 2009 Appeal from Boone Circuit. The following cases are dismissed for failure to file briefs pursuantto Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-5. Page 4

Read More

SCHKEEPER v. DIRECTOR OF LABOR, 96 Ark. App. xix (2006)

Schkeeper v. Director of Labor. No. E 06-133.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. October 25, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Cases Affirmed by the Arkansas Court of Appeals Without Written Opinion Pursuant to Rule 5-2(B), Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court.

Read More

DELANEY ADM’R v. MIZE, 269 Ark. 194 (1980)

L. D. DELANEY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Betty DELANEY v. Mike MIZE No. 79-310 599 S.W.2d 710Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 2, 1980 Rehearing denied July 7, 1980 1. AUTOMOBILES — WILLFUL MISCONDUCT — DISTINGUISHED FROM GROSS NEGLIGENCE. — To constitute willful misconduct there must be a conscious failure […]

Read More

NIELSEN v. BERGER-NIELSEN, 347 Ark. 996 (2002)

William Lee NIELSEN, Appellant v. Deborah BERGER-NIELSEN, and Joe Benson Appellees 01-997 69 S.W.3d 414Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 14, 2002 1. Appeal error — chancery cases — standard of review. — The supreme court reviews chancery cases de novo on the record, but it does not reverse a finding of fact by […]

Read More

PORTER v. STATE, 2010 Ark. 219

Darnell PORTER, $366.00 in United States Currency, LG Cell Phone SN 905KPNT725423, I-Phone SN 829238G4Y7H, Petitioners v. STATE of Arkansas, Respondent 10-284Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 6, 2010 Pro Se Motion for Belated Appeal [Circuit Court of Faulkner County, CV 2009-1046, Hon. David L. Reynolds, Judge], Motion Denied. PER CURIAM. In 2009, an […]

Read More

BEYERS v. BEYERS, CA10-944 (Ark.App. 11-2-2011)

Cynthia Marie BEYERS, Appellant v. George L. BEYERS, III, and Donna G. Beyers, Appellee CA10-944Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 2, 2011 Appeal from Saline Circuit. MOTION SUBMITTED Appellees’ motion to dismiss appeal. Page 1

Read More

GARRETT v. DIRECTOR, E11-151 (Ark.App. 11-16-2011)

Mary E. GARRETT, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E11-151Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 16, 2011 PER CURIAM DECISION The following case appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review is affirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(f). Page 1

Read More

ABRAHAM v. TURNER, 216 Ark. 22 (1949)

ABRAHAM v. TURNER No. 4-8955 223 S.W.2d 830Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 31, 1949. APPEAL AND ERROR. — Where appellant employed appellee to pump the fluid from appellant’s cesspool and no definite price for the work was agreed upon, the finding of the jury on conflicting evidence that appellee was entitled to $200 […]

Read More

SCOTT v. CARNES, 183 Ark. 650 (1931)

SCOTT v. CARNES. 37 S.W.2d 876Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 20, 1931. 1. VENDOR AND PURCHASER — GOOD FAITH — BURDEN OF PROOF. — Where a purchaser shows that he has paid a valuable consideration in good faith, the burden of showing that he purchased with notice is on the one alleging it. […]

Read More

WILLS v. LACEFIELD, 10-568 (Ark. 7-27-2011)

Martin Donald WILLS, Appellant v. Janet F. LACEFIELD, Appellee 10-568Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered July 27, 2011 Appeal from Baxter Circuit. PER CURIAM ORDERS PETITION FOR REHEARING: Petition for rehearing was denied today in the following case. Page 1

Read More

MONTGOMERY v. BUTLER, 309 Ark. 491 (1992)

Lois MONTGOMERY and Bill Montgomery v. Dr. R.C. BUTLER No. 91-100 834 S.W.2d 148Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 1, 1992 1. APPEAL ERROR — ABSTRACT DEFICIENT — SUFFICIENT MATERIAL INCLUDED WITH WHICH TO RENDER A DECISION ON THE MERITS. — Where the appellants failed to comply with Rule 9(d) by not including any […]

Read More

MORRIS CO. v. ALEXANDER CO., 180 Ark. 735 (1929)

MORRIS COMPANY v. ALEXANDER COMPANY. 22 S.W.2d 558Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered December 23, 1929. 1. JUDGMENT — RES JUDICATA. — Where the Supreme Court reversed a a decree for plaintiff in a suit for construction of a deed and remanded the cause with directions to enter a decree for defendants on the ground […]

Read More

M.S. v. STATE, CA10-828 (Ark.App. 4-13-2011)

M.S., Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CA10-828Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 13, 2011 Appeal from Crittenden Circuit. PER CURIAM ORDERS Motion of Charles Brian Williams for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $1,400.00. Page 2

Read More

NORTH AMERICAN PROVISION v. FISCHER L. C. CO., 168 Ark. 106 (1925)

NORTH AMERICAN PROVISION COMPANY v. FISCHER LIME CEMENT COMPANY. 269 S.W. 993Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered March 2, 1925. 1. CORPORATIONS — COMPLAINT — MISDESCRIPTION OF CORPORATION. — The contention that a judgment against the Morris Packing Company, described in the complaint as an Illinois corporation, would not bind the Morris Packing Company, a […]

Read More

EDWARDS v. DIRECTOR, E07-217 (Ark.App. 2-20-2008)

Alan R. EDWARDS, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E07-217Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 20, 2008 The following cases appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review are affirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(b). Page 4

Read More