NORTH AMERICAN PROVISION COMPANY v. FISCHER LIME CEMENT COMPANY. 269 S.W. 993Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered March 2, 1925. 1. CORPORATIONS — COMPLAINT — MISDESCRIPTION OF CORPORATION. — The contention that a judgment against the Morris Packing Company, described in the complaint as an Illinois corporation, would not bind the Morris Packing Company, a […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
EDWARDS v. DIRECTOR, E07-217 (Ark.App. 2-20-2008)
Alan R. EDWARDS, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E07-217Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 20, 2008 The following cases appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review are affirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(b). Page 4
KING v. FRENCH, CA10-736 (Ark.App. 5-4-2011)
Kenneth KING, Appellant v. A.O. FRENCH and John Edd Curry, as trustees of the Tyro Cemetery, and Keith Griffin d/b/a/ Griffin Funeral Service, Appellee CA10-736Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 4, 2011 Appeal from Lincoln Circuit. MOTION SUBMITTED PETITION FOR REHEARING: Page 1
HOGUE v. STATE, 323 Ark. 515 (1996)
Greg HOGUE v. STATE of Arkansas CR 95-985 915 S.W.2d 276Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered February 19, 1996 1. CRIMINAL LAW — ACCOMPLICE TESTIMONY — INDEPENDENT, CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE REQUIRED. — Where accomplice testimony is involved, Arkansas law requires that there be independent, corroborative evidence which tends to connect the defendant with the commission of […]
FARMER v. SMITH, 227 Ark. 638 (1957)
FARMER v. SMITH No. 5-1202 300 S.W.2d 937Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 1, 1957. [Rehearing denied May 6, 1957] 1. APPEAL AND ERROR — NEW TRIAL, REVIEW OF TRIAL COURT’S DISCRETION. — The action of a trial court in setting aside a jury verdict and awarding a new trial will not be reversed […]
MASON v. STATE, CACR09-298 (Ark.App. 9-2-2009)
Gary J. MASON, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR09-298Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 2, 2009 Appeal from Scott Circuit. SUBMISSIONS Page 6
DANIELS v. STATE, 2009 Ark. 243
Antonio DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee No. CR09-370Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 30, 2009 Motion for Rule on Clerk, Remanded. PER CURIAM Antonio Daniels, by and through his attorney Dale West, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. The clerk of this court refused to file the record in this […]
ARKANSAS DOH v. WESTARK CHRISTIAN ACTION, 322 Ark. 440 (1995)
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Sandra B. Nichols, M.D., Director, and Henry C. Robinson, Jr., Director and State Registrar, Division of Vital Records v. WESTARK CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL, a Nonprofit Corporation 94-1264 910 S.W.2d 199Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 13, 1995 1. RECORDS — FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT — INSPECTION OF “PUBLIC RECORDS.” — […]
BUCK v. BRASHEARS, 245 Ark. 583 (1968)
Mrs. R. J. BUCK v. Clifton BRESHEARS, et al No. 4685. 433 S.W.2d 377Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion Delivered November 11, 1968 1. DESCENT DISTRIBUTION — ANCESTRAL ESTATES — ESTABLISHMENT. — Ancestral estates can be created only by a gift, devise, or inheritance to a person who is related by blood to the donor. 2. […]
RIGGS v. B S CONTRACTORS, INC., CA10-24 (Ark.App. 9-1-2010)
Michael RIGGS, Appellant v. B S CONTRACTORS, INC. and Continental Western Insurance Co., Appellee CA10-24Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 1, 2010 Page 1 Appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. LARRY D. VAUGHT, Chief Judge. Affirmed. Gruber and Brown, JJ., agree. Page 1
ANGELL v. COOPER TIRE AND RUBBER CO., 92 Ark. App. xvii (2005)
Angell v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Company. No. CA 04-359.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. September 28, 2005. CRABTREE, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.
SAMPLES v. STATE, 50 Ark. App. 163 (1995)
Gary Dean SAMPLES v. STATE of Arkansas CA CR 94-667 902 S.W.2d 257Court of Appeals of Arkansas En Banc Opinion delivered July 5, 1995 1. MOTIONS — MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT — FACTORS ON REVIEW. — A motion for directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, and the sufficiency argument is […]
MEEKS v. STATE, 97 Ark. App. XII (2006)
Meeks v. State. No. CA CR 06-493.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. November 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] HART, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication affirmed.
CLARK v. JOHNSON, 09-431 (Ark. 2-25-2010)
Mary CLARK, Appellant v. Dr. Arthur JOHNSON et al., Appellee 09-431Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 25, 2010 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. SUBMISSIONS Argued orally. Page 5