LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. CHAMBERS, 76 Ark. App. 286 (2002)

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and FILM TRANSIT, APPELLANTS v. RANDALL CHAMBERS, APPELLEE CA 01-424 64 S.W.3d 775Court of Appeals of Arkansas Divisions I, II, and III Opinion delivered January 9, 2002 1. Administrative law procedure — agency’s interpretation of statute — not overturned unless clearly wrong. — The appellate court will not overturn an administrative […]

Read More

BROWN v. DIRECTOR, E11-130 (Ark.App. 11-2-2011)

Latoya BROWN, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E11-130Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 2, 2011 PER CURIAM DECISION The following case appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review is affirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(f). Page 1

Read More

STRICKLAND v. STATE, 2010 Ark. App. 599

Wendell Lee STRICKLAND, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CA CR 09-1286Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. Opinion Delivered September 15, 2010 Appeal from the Benton County Circuit Court, [NO. CR-2008-61-2], Honorable David S. Clinger, Judge, Affirmed. RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge. A Benton County jury convicted Wendell Lee Strickland of rape and sentenced him […]

Read More

NEWBURGER COTTON COMPANY v. STEVENS, 167 Ark. 257 (1925)

NEWBURGER COTTON COMPANY v. STEVENS. 267 S.W. 777Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered January 19, 1925. 1. TROVER AND CONVERSION — UNAUTHORIZED SALE BY WAREHOUSEMAN. — One who buys and disposes of cotton belonging to plaintiff from a warehouseman having no authority to sell same is liable for its conversion, though he acted in good […]

Read More

MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. HUGHES, 229 Ark. 503 (1958)

MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. HUGHES No. 5-1587 316 S.W.2d 827Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 20, 1958. 1. INSURANCE — AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY — ASSIGNED RISK PLAN, PURPOSES OF. — The purposes of the assigned risk plan [Ark. Stats, 75-1486] is to provide motor vehicle liability insurance for those persons who are in good […]

Read More

KAYLOR v. LEWIS, 212 Ark. 785 (1948)

KAYLOR v. LEWIS. No. 4-8399 208 S.W.2d 185Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 2, 1948. Rehearing denied March 1, 1948. 1. REFORMATION. — A voluntary conveyance, one without consideration except love and affection, cannot be reformed, except where the grantee takes possession under the deed and makes valuable improvements. 2. DEEDS — ALTERATION. — […]

Read More

HORN v. IMPERIAL CAS. IND. CO., 5 Ark. App. 277 (1982)

Jackie W. HORN v. IMPERIAL CASUALTY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY No. CA 82-1 636 S.W.2d 302Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 30, 1982 [Rehearing denied August 18, 1982.] 1. INSURANCE — AMBIGUOUS LANGUAGE STRICTLY CONSTRUED AGAINST INSURER. — If the language in an insurance policy is ambiguous, then the court must construe the language […]

Read More

CAIN v. STATE, 183 Ark. 606 (1931)

CAIN v. STATE. 37 S.W.2d 708Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 13, 1931 1. CRIMINAL LAW — SPECIAL TERM OF COURT — NOTICE. — In absence of a contrary showing, it will be presumed that timely notice of a special term of the circuit court was served on the prosecuting attorney, especially where the […]

Read More

BOND v. TOMMY REED, 10-144 (Ark. 5-20-2010)

Bob’s Bail BOND, Inc., Appellant v. TOMMY REED, Executive Director, Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board, Appellee 10-144Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 20, 2010 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Sixteenth Division. Appellant’s motion for stay of briefing schedule and to supplement the record is granted. Page 3

Read More

AMERICAN ZINC PRODUCTS CO. v. SANDERS, 175 Ark. 133 (1927)

AMERICAN ZINC PRODUCTS COMPANY v. SANDERS. 298 S.W. 857Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 24, 1927. 1. CORPORATIONS — INTERVENTION IN MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE. — An intervention in a mortgage foreclosure suit to set aside and cancel the mortgage as fraudulent, and as giving preference to creditors of the insolvent corporation, must fail, where it […]

Read More

ROSE v. ETOCH, 2010 Ark. App. 305

Anthony ROSE, Appellant v. Louis A. ETOCH, Charles Halbert, Donald E. Knapp, Jr., And Etoch Law Firm, Appellees CA 09-1129Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion Delivered April 7, 2010 Appeal from the Phillips County Circuit Court, [NO. CV-08-305], Honorable Richard Lee Proctor, Judge, Affirmed. WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge. Anthony Rose brings this pro […]

Read More

WASHINGTON v. WASHINGTON, 2010 Ark. App. 16

Charles D. WASHINGTON and Shirley Washington, Appellants v. Andrew WASHINGTON, et al., Appellees CA 09-399Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion Delivered January 6, 2010 Appeal from the Izard County Circuit Court [No. CV-07-105-2], Honorable John Norman Harkey, Judge, Dismissed. COURTNEY HUDSON HENRY, Judge. Appellants Shirley and Charles Washington appeal from a decree of […]

Read More

BAPTIST HEALTH v. MURPHY, 365 Ark. 115 (2006)

BAPTIST HEALTH v. Bruce E. MURPHY, M.D., Scott L. Beau, M.D., David C. Bauman, M.D., D.Andrew Henry, M.D., David M. Mego, M.D., and William A. Rollefson, M.D. No. 04-430. 226 S.W.3d 800Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered February 2, 2006. 1. ACTION — NO IMPROPER SWITCHING OF CAUSE OF ACTION. — Where the complaint expressly […]

Read More

BROWN v. DIRECTOR, E07-240 (Ark.App. 3-19-2008)

Michael D. BROWN, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E07-240Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 19, 2008 The following cases appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review are affirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(b). Page 3

Read More

DAVIS v. DIRECTOR, E08-110 (Ark.App. 10-8-2008)

Randy R. DAVIS, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E08-110Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 8, 2008 The following cases appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review areaffirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(b). Page 4

Read More

JONES-BLAIR CO. v. HAMMETT, 326 Ark. 74 (1996)

JONES-BLAIR COMPANY v. Lucy HAMMETT, d/b/a Conway Carpets and Interiors 95-1359 930 S.W.2d 335Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered September 30, 1996 1. ATTORNEY CLIENT — WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL — ARCP RULE 64(B) NOT COMPLIED WITH. — There was no question that ARCP Rule 64(b), which provides for the withdrawal of counsel for good cause […]

Read More

WYNN MOTEL HOTEL, INC. v. TEXARKANA, 217 Ark. 314 (1950)

WYNN MOTEL HOTEL, INC., v. CITY OF TEXARKANA No. 4-9207 230 S.W.2d 649Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 15, 1950. Rehearing denied July 3, 1950. 1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS. — In appellee’s action to require appellants to remove obstructions from the street, the question whether appellants had acquired title to the […]

Read More

FRYE v. STATE, CR08-635 (Ark. 12-4-2008)

Doyle Dewayne FRYE, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR08-635Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered December 4, 2008 Appeal from Benton Circuit. Appellee’s motion for release of sealed record. Page 5

Read More