CHICAGO R. I. P. RY. CO., LOWDEN, TRUSTEE v. SCOTT, ADMR. No. 4-4326 95 S.W.2d 630Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered June 22, 1936. 1. CARRIERS — RAILROADS. — While, under 8562, Crawford Moses’ Dig., providing that “all railroads * * * shall be responsible for all damages to persons and property done or caused […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
JERRY v. STATE, 367 Ark. xix (2006)
Herron, Jerry L. v. State. No. CR 05-1062.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 21, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication, affirmed.
WOMMACK v. INGRAM, CA09-1275 (Ark.App. 4-28-2010)
Michael L. WOMMACK, Appellant v. Shelly R. INGRAM, Appellee CA09-1275Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 28, 2010 Appeal from Washington Circuit. Motion of Jeff H. Watson to withdraw and of J. Jason Boyeskie to be substituted as counsel for appellee. Page 5
SUGGS v. STATE, 2010 Ark. App. 571
Dawn Dewayne SUGGS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CA CR 09-1388Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. Opinion Delivered September 1, 2010 Appeal from the Crittenden County Circuit Court, [NO. CR-09-691], Honorable Ralph Edwin Wilson, Jr., Judge, Affirmed. WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge. Appellant Dawn Suggs was found guilty by a Crittenden County jury of […]
CARTER v. MEEK, 70 Ark. App. 447 (2000)
DAVID CARTER v. GLENDA MEEK CA 99-1436 20 S.W.3d 417Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division IV Opinion delivered June 28, 2000 1. Wills — order admitting will to probate should have been set aside — proof required for attesting witnesses not present. — The probate court erred in failing to set aside its order admitting […]
KOSTER v. STATE, 371 Ark. 663 (2007)
269 S.W.3d 376 Michael David KOSTER v. STATE of Arkansas. No. 07-1160.Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered December 6, 2007. APPEAL ERROR — ATTORNEY CANDIDLY ADMITTED FAULT — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK GRANTED. — Where, in accordance with McDonald v. State, appellant’s attorney candidly admitted fault in connection with the untimely filing of an […]
BROWN v. STATE, CR09-412 (Ark. 9-10-2009)
Richard BROWN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR09-412Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 10, 2009 Appeal from Saline Circuit. Appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal is granted. Page 4
STROUD v. CROW, 209 Ark. 820 (1946)
STROUD v. CROW. No. 4-7834 192 S.W.2d 548Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 25, 1946. 1. COURTS. — The Supreme Court cannot, after the lapse of term, review or reform its opinion. 2. APPEAL AND ERROR. — The Supreme Court being a court of appellate jurisdiction will not decide an issue not presented to […]
BARR v. STATE, 336 Ark. 220 (1999)
Richard Francis BARR III v. STATE of Arkansas CR 98-328 984 S.W.2d 792Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 28, 1999 1. APPEAL ERROR — ARGUMENT UNSUPPORTED BY AUTHORITY — SUPREME COURT WILL NOT RESEARCH POINT. — Where appellant cited no authority and made no persuasive argument that the trial court’s ruling was in error, […]
AUSTIN v. ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, 320 Ark. 292 (1995)
William L. AUSTIN and Deborah M. Austin, his wife v. ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION 94-997 895 S.W.2d 941Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered April 10, 1995 1. HIGHWAYS — SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY PREVENTS HIGHWAY COMMISSION FROM BEING SUED — PROSPECTIVE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PROPER. — The Highway Commission cannot be sued, and the immunity cannot be waived […]
CASTILLO v. STATE, CACR08-749 (Ark.App. 3-4-2009)
Juan CASTILLO, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-749Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 4, 2009 Appeal from Hot Spring Circuit. Motion of Gregory Crain for attorney’s fees. Page 5
BLOODMAN v. STATE, 09-657 (Ark. 4-8-2010)
Teresa BLOODMAN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee 09-657Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 8, 2010 Appeal from Mississippi Circuit, Osceola District. Page 4
GARRISON v. STATE, 270 Ark. 426 (1980)
James GARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 80-34 605 S.W.2d 467Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 24, 1980 1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — FAILURE TO TRY DEFENDANT WITHIN THREE TERMS OF COURT — DISMISSAL REQUIRED WHERE DELAY NOT EXCUSABLE. — Where a criminal defendant was not tried within three terms of court, […]
FLANIGAN v. DIRECTOR, E08-204 (Ark.App. 3-11-2009)
Heather A. FLANIGAN, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E08-204Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 11, 2009 PER CURIAM DECISIONS The following cases appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review are affirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(b). Page 6
WILLIAMS v. NABCO, CA08-959 (Ark.App. 9-3-2008)
David R. WILLIAMS, Appellant v. NABCO et al., Appellee CA08-959Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 3, 2008 Appeal from Workers’ Compensation Commission. Appellant’s motion for rule on the clerk is denied. Page 4
CHENOWITH v. STATE, 321 Ark. 522 (1995)
Phillip CHENOWITH v. STATE of Arkansas CR 95-124 905 S.W.2d 838Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 18, 1995 1. Motions — directed verdict — factors on review. — A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, and when such a challenge is made in a criminal case, […]
WHITMORE v. SELIG, CA07-86 (Ark.App. 10-24-2007)
Carolyn WHITMORE v. John SELIG, Director, DHHS et al CA07-86Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 24, 2007 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Third Division.
WELCH v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, 354 Ark. 303 (2003)
Billy WELCH v. STATE of Arkansas CR 03-539 119 S.W.3d 513Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered October 2, 2003 APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part […]
McALMONT v. McCAIN-HWY. 161, LLC, 99 Ark. App. 431 (2007)
262 S.W.3d 185 McALMONT SUBURBAN SEWER IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. 242 v. McCAIN-HWY. 161, LLC. No. CA 06-1445.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered September 12, 2007. 1. CONTRACTS — THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY — STANDING. — The circuit court correctly concluded that appellee was a third-party beneficiary of the District/Committee agreement; because appellee was a beneficiary of […]
TOWNLEY v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, CA11-797 (Ark.App. 12-7-2011)
Ricky TOWNLEY, Appellant v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION et al., Appellee CA11-797Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered December 7, 2011 Appeal from Workers’ Compensation Commission. SUBMISSION Page 5