Bob H. GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 81-29. 621 S.W.2d 4Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 2, 1981 [Rehearing denied October 7, 1981.] 1. EVIDENCE — WITNESS — THIRD PARTY CHARACTERIZATION OF STATEMENTS BY WITNESS — NECESSITY FOR WITNESS TO SUBSCRIBE TO STATEMENTS. — A witness may not be charged […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
MYERS v. STATE, CR07-348 (Ark. 5-17-2007)
Michael Wade Myers and Scott Lynn Hall v. State of Arkansas CR07-348Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered May 17, 2007 Appeal from Lonoke Circuit. PER CURIAM ORDERS REVIEWS DENIED: Petitions for review were denied today in the following cases. Imber, J., not participating.
OLD REPUBLIC INS. CO. v. MARTIN, 229 Ark. 1065 (1959)
OLD REPUBLIC INS. CO. v. MARTIN No. 5-1753 320 S.W.2d 266Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 2, 1959. 1. EVIDENCE — DELIVERY OF LETTER, PRESUMPTION AND BURDEN OF PROOF. — Where a letter, properly and sufficiently addressed and properly stamped, was mailed, there is a presumption of fact, not of law, that the letter […]
GORENFLO v. BROWN, 233 Ark. 221 (1961)
GORENFLO v. BROWN. No. 5-2304 343 S.W.2d 564Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 6, 1961. 1. TRUSTS — RESULTING TRUSTS, APPLICATION OF STATUTE OF FRAUDS TO. — A resulting trust is not required to be in writing since Ark. Stats., 38-107 exempts resulting trusts from the operation of the statute of frauds. 2. TRUSTS […]
SPEARS v. STATE, 194 Ark. 836 (1937)
SPEARS v. STATE. No. CR 4067 109 S.W.2d 926Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 8, 1937. 1. CRIMINAL LAW — POWER OF COURT OVER SUSPENDED SENTENCE. — Under 4054, Pope’s Dig., the court has power at any time it is in session to revoke a suspended sentence and enter final judgment “whenever that course […]
ARKANSAS DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVS. v. DOUGLAS, 11-669 (Ark. 11-17-2011)
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellant v. James DOUGLAS, Appellee 11-669Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 17, 2011 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. MOTION SUBMITTED Appellant’s motion for a nunc pro tunc order or alternative motion for appointment of a special administrator. Page 4
MEEKINS v. STATE, 31 Ark. App. 70 (1990)
Reynaldo MEEKINS v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 90-81 787 S.W.2d 258Court of Appeals of Arkansas En Banc Opinion delivered April 18, 1990 APPEAL ERROR — APPEAL BONDS DECIDED BY TRIAL COURT, NOT APPELLATE COURT. — Appeal bonds are normally decided by the trial court in the first instance, and where appellant failed to […]
ROBINSON v. STATE, 359 Ark. XX (2004)
Robinson v. State. No. CR 03-1251.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 14, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication Motion to File Belated Brief granted; Pro Se Motions for Duplication of Brief at Public Expense and for Appointment of Counsel denied.
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY v. LAMAR ADV. HOLDING CO., 10-932 (Ark. 6-23-2011)
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Arkansas, Appellant v. LAMAR ADVANTAGE HOLDING COMPANY, Appellee 10-932Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered June 23, 2011 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Sixth Division. PER CURIAM ORDERS Appellee’s motion to recall mandate and for permission to file petition for rehearing is denied. Baker, J., not participating. Page 2
WARD v. DOSS, 361 Ark. 153 (2005)
Shelby A. WARD, III v. Teresa Gail Ward DOSS. No. 04-532. 205 S.W.3d 767Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered March 24, 2005. 1. DIVORCE — ORDER OF CHILD SUPPORT — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — The supreme court’s standard of review for an appeal from a child-support order is de novo on the record, and the […]
DIERKS v. STATE, CACR08-297 (Ark.App. 8-20-2008)
Wayne Alan DIERKS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-297Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered August 20, 2008 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Fourth Division. Appellee’s motion to dismiss is moot. Page 2
WILSON v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, 310 Ark. 154 (1992)
John Vernon WILSON v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, Arkansas No. 91-290 835 S.W.2d 837Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 29, 1992 Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing November 2, 1992[*] [*] Hayes, Glaze and Brown, JJ., would deny rehearing. 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — JUST COMPENSATION FOR A TAKING MEANS FULL COMPENSATION. — The Arkansas Constitution requires just […]
GRAY v. MORELAND, CA09-452 (Ark.App. 8-26-2009)
Don GRAY, Appellant v. Bob MORELAND and Moreland Aviation Enterprises, Inc., Appellee CA09-452Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered August 26, 2009 Appeal from Franklin Circuit, Northern District. Appellee Bob Moreland’s notices of bankruptcy filing. Case stayed. Status report due in 90 days. Page 3
McGEHEE v. HOBBS, 11-577 (Ark. 9-1-2011)
Jason Farrell McGEHEE, Bruce Ward, Marcel Wayne Williams, Appellant v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellee 11-577Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 1, 2011 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Sixth Division. MOTION SUBMITTED Status Report from Honorable Tim Fox, Circuit Judge. Page 3
CLAY v. STATE, 262 Ark. 285 (1977)
HENRY CLAY v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 77-113 556 S.W.2d 137Supreme Court of Arkansas (Division I) Opinion delivered October 10, 1977 1. TRIAL — CONTINUANCE, REQUEST FOR — DISCRETION OF TRIAL JUDGE IN GRANTING. — The trial judge has a very broad discretion in granting or denying a request for a continuance. 2. TRIAL […]
MEACHAM v. MID-SOUTH COTTON GROWERS ASSOCIATION, 196 Ark. 78 (1938)
MEACHAM v. MID-SOUTH COTTON GROWERS ASSOCIATION. No. 4-5051 115 S.W.2d 1078Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 25, 1938. 1. PRINCIPAL AND AGENT — EVIDENCE. — Where appellants shipped cotton with instructions to deliver it to the M. Asso., and the M. Asso. having gone out of business, it was delivered to the C. Company, […]
McGEHEE v. CUNNINGHAM, 181 Ark. 148 (1930)
McGEHEE v. CUNNINGHAM. 25 S.W.2d 449Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 3, 1930. 1. EVIDENCE — WRITTEN CONTRACT — EXTRINSIC CIRCUMSTANCES. — Although correspondence between parties to a written contract preceding the execution thereof cannot be considered for the purpose of altering or varying the terms of a written contract, it may be considered […]
BYRD v. STATE, CACR09-1113 (Ark.App. 2-17-2010)
Ashlie BYRD, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR09-1113Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 17, 2010 Appeal from Benton Circuit. Page 12
DOWDLE v. RANEY, COUNTY JUDGE, 201 Ark. 836 (1941)
DOWDLE v. RANEY, COUNTY JUDGE. No. 4-6188 147 S.W.2d 42Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 3, 1941. 1. EMINENT DOMAIN — DAMAGES FOR APPROPRIATED PROPERTY. — The attempt by appellee to appropriate the land of appellants for highway purposes allowing damages in the sum of one and one-half times the assessed value thereof as […]
MOON v. GEORGIA STATE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, 200 Ark. 1012 (1940)
MOON v. GEORGIA STATE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION. No. 4-6022 142 S.W.2d 234Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered July 8, 1940. 1. IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS — FORECLOSURE OF LIENS — RIGHT OF COLLECTOR TO PURCHASE. — Appellant’s son-in-law was collector for a municipal improvement district. Appellant purchased from the district for $104.80 property admittedly worth $4,000. The agreement […]