William P. WHITEFIELD and his Wife v. Burns HAGGART et al No. 81-7. 615 S.W.2d 350Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 11, 1981 1. BROKERS — RIGHT TO RECOVER COMMISSION — VALIDITY OR INAUDIBLY OF OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE IMMATERIAL. — The validity or invalidity of an oiler and acceptance between a prospective buyer and […]
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
ISHMAEL v. ISMAIL, 66 Ark. App. 232 (1999)
Kal ISHMAEL v. Sally Rose ISMAIL CA 98-896 989 S.W.2d 923Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division IV Opinion delivered May 5, 1999 1. DIVORCE — ATTORNEY’S FEES — CHANCELLOR’S DISCRETION TO AWARD. — A chancellor has considerable discretion to award attorney’s fees in a divorce case; in determining whether to award attorney’s fees, the chancellor […]
IN RE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ADMIN. ORDER NO. 10 (Ark. 11-11-2010)
IN RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER No. 10 Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 11, 2010 PER CURIAM ORDERS See per curiam this date. Page 3
TYLER v. D.H.S., CA06-473 (Ark.App. 6-13-2007)
Donald TYLER v. Arkansas DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES CA06-473Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered June 13, 2007 Appeal from Fulton Circuit. Rehearings Denied.
COCKEREL v. STATE, 266 Ark. 908 (1979)
Lawrence Shawn COCKEREL v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 79-34 587 S.W.2d 596Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 19, 1979 and released for publication October 10, 1979 1. CRIMINAL LAW — RETRIAL OF ACCUSED — MORE SEVERE SENTENCE NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROHIBITED UPON RECONVICTION. — An accused is not put in double jeopardy […]
CULP v. CULP, 206 Ark. 875 (1944)
CULP v. CULP. No. 4-7282 178 S.W.2d 52Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 28, 1944. 1. WILLS — STATUTES. — Section 14525 of Pope’s Digest providing that as to a child not mentioned in the will of the testator the testator shall be held to have died intestate as to that child does not […]
AUTRAND v. STATE, CACR09-901 (Ark.App. 2-24-2010)
Ryan R. AUTRAND, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR09-901Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered February 24, 2010 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Page 6
LANE v. PFEIFER, 264 Ark. 162 (1978)
John A. S. LANE, Jr., d/b/a FORTUNE CAPITOL COMPANY v. Eugene M. PFEIFER, III, et al No. 77-188 568 S.W.2d 212Supreme Court of Arkansas (En Banc) Opinion delivered July 17, 1978 1. CONTRACTS — PAROL EVIDENCE — INADMISSIBILITY TO CHANGE WRITTEN CONTRACT. — It is well recognized that parol evidence cannot be introduced to change […]
COMMERCIAL STANDARD INS. CO. v. WALLER, 190 Ark. 636 (1935)
COMMERCIAL STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. WALLER. No. 4-3865 80 S.W.2d 78Supreme Court of Arkansas [Opinion delivered March 25, 1935] 1. INSURANCE — NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF POLICY. — Where a cancellation provision of an insurance policy provided no definite period for notice of cancellation, the law reads into such provision a reasonable time. 2. INSURANCE […]
BLOODMAN v. STATE, 09-657 (Ark. 9-3-2009)
Teresa BLOODMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellees 09-657Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 3, 2009 Appeal from Mississippi Circuit, Osceola District. Appellant’s motion to settle and supplement the record. Page 6
HYDE v. McNEELY, 193 Ark. 1139 (1937)
HYDE v. McNEELY. No. 4-4641 104 S.W.2d 1068Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered May 3, 1937. 1. INSANE PERSONS — JURISDICTION. — In a proceeding in the probate court to have a person adjudged insane, the direction in the statute (Crawford Moses’ Dig., 5829) that the subject of the inquiry be brought before the court, […]
WARREN v. STATE, 103 Ark. App. 124 (2008)
Anthony Antonio WARREN v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CA CR 07-942.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered September 10, 2008. 1. CRIMINAL LAW — SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE — THERE WAS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT APPELLANT’S CONVICTION. — There was substantial evidence that appellant acted as the principal in committing a Class Y felony terroristic […]
JAMES v. STATE, CR10-317 (Ark. 4-8-2010)
Robert JAMES, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR10-317Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 8, 2010 Appeal from Logan Circuit, Northern District. Motion of John R. Irwin to be relieved as attorney for appellant. Page 3
HARRIS v. STATE, 169 Ark. 627 (1925)
HARRIS v. STATE. 276 S.W. 361Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 26, 1925. 1. STATUTES — CONSTRUCTION. — Statutes should be construed with reference to the public policy they are designed to accomplish. 2. CRIMINAL LAW — SPECIAL TERM OF COURT. — Crawford Moses Digest, 2211-2214, providing for the calling of a special term […]
TATUM v. NEAL, 10-938 (Ark. 10-28-2010)
Ricky TATUM, Appellant, v. Honorable Oily NEAL, Appellee 10-938Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 28, 2010 Appeal from Lee Circuit. Pro se motion for rule on clerk to file mandamus petition without a certified record is denied.
RITHOLZ v. ARK. STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY, 206 Ark. 671 (1944)
RITHOLZ v. ARKANSAS STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY. No. 4-7263 177 S.W.2d 410Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 24, 1944. 1. INJUNCTION — RIGHT TO CONTROL UNTRUE ADVERTISING. — Where by statute laymen are prohibited from engaging in optometry by employing a licensed optometrist, and certain kinds of advertising are prohibited, and defendants (against whom […]
WYNE v. STATE, CACR06-1233 (Ark.App. 5-16-2007)
Larry Donnell WYNE v. STATE of Arkansas CACR06-1233Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered May 16, 2007 Appeal from Saline Circuit. SUBMISSIONS Page 5
WRIGHT v. STATE, CACR06-720 (Ark.App. 3-21-2007)
Deanna Wright v. State of Arkansas. CACR06-720Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 21, 2007 Appeal from Scott Circuit. Motion of Kent Walker for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $1,400.00.
SCOTT QUALITY PRODUCTS v. GAINES, 09-991 (Ark. 9-24-2009)
SCOTT QUALITY PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant v. Darrell GAINES, Appellee 09-991Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 24, 2009 Appeal from Lonoke Circuit. Motion for rule on clerk is denied. Page 3
UNITED LOAN INVESTMENT CO. v. NUNEZ, 225 Ark. 362 (1955)
UNITED LOAN INVESTMENT COMPANY v. NUNEZ. No. 5-705 282 S.W.2d 595Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 10, 1955. 1. EVIDENCE — PAROL EVIDENCE OF CONSIDERATION FOR DEED. — Parol evidence to the effect that one Keller was a mere conduit of title and never a bona fide or beneficial Owner of the property in […]