SCOTT v. STATE, 303 Ark. 197 (1990)

Billy Ray SCOTT v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 90-6 795 S.W.2d 353Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered September 10, 1990 [Rehearing denied October 8, 1990.] 1. CRIMINAL LAW — FIRST DEGREE MURDER — SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. — Where the medical examiner testified that there were no signs of stippling or gunpowder around the wound on […]

Read More

SCOTT v. SCOTT, 86 Ark. App. 120 (2004)

161 S.W.3d 307 Robert SCOTT v. Rita SCOTT CA 03-692Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. Opinion delivered April 28, 2004 1. APPEAL ERROR — DOMESTIC-RELATIONS DECISIONS — STANDARD OF REVIEW. — The appellate court reviews domestic-relations decisions de novo on the record; although review is de novo, the court will not reverse a finding […]

Read More

KELLY v. NORRIS, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)

Kelly v. Norris. No. 03-1295.Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 28, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Affirmed.

Read More

BEASLEY v. STATE, 47 Ark. App. 92 (1994)

Michael BEASLEY v. STATE of Arkansas CA CR 93-998 885 S.W.2d 906Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division II Opinion delivered October 26, 1994 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROHIBITED. — The United States and Arkansas Constitutions both prohibit placing a person twice in jeopardy for the same offense, and this protection applies to both […]

Read More

HALL v. NORRIS, 362 Ark. XVII (2005)

Hall v. Larry Norris. No. 05-88.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 19, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief moot; appeal dismissed.

Read More

IN RE CLIENT SECURITY FUND, 303 Ark. Appx. 757 (1990)

IN THE MATTER OF THE CLIENT SECURITY FUND Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered July 16, 1990. PER CURIAM. Ms. Martha Miller of Little Rock, Arkansas is hereby appointed to the Client Security Fund Committee replacing Mr. Donald P. Raney of Searcy, Arkansas, second congressional district. Ms. Miller is appointed for a term expiring July […]

Read More

WANN v. STATE, CACR06-1423 (Ark.App. 1-30-2008)

Robert WANN, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR06-1423Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered January 30, 2008 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Motion of David L. Dunagin for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $800.00. Page 3

Read More

ROSS v. JONES, 80 Ark. App. 382 (2003)

Doris ROSS, Johnnie J. Harlen, Walter Harlen and Jessie Harlen, Appellants v. Orval Ray JONES and Evelyn Sue Jones, Appellees CA 02-42 96 S.W.3d 738Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. Opinion Delivered January 29, 2003 1. APPEAL ERROR — NOTICE OF APPEAL — TIMELY FILING. — Rule 4(a) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate […]

Read More

VICK v. STATE, CACR08-1271 (Ark.App. 1-27-2010)

Stanley Ray VICK, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-1271Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered January 27, 2010 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Greenwood District. PER CURIAM ORDERS Motion of David L. Dunagin for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $900.00. Page 3

Read More

CRENSHAW v. DOUBLETREE CORP., 81 Ark. App. 157 (2003)

Ken CRENSHAW and Barbara Crenshaw v. DOUBLETREE CORP.; Promus Corp.; Capital City Hotel Ltd. Partnership; Seymour N. Logan Assocs., Inc.; and Doubletree Hotel Systems, Inc CA 02-490 98 S.W.3d 836Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. Opinion delivered March 5, 2003 1. JUDGMENT — SUMMARY JUDGMENT — WHEN GRANTED. — Summary judgment is regarded simply […]

Read More

CHASE HOME FINANCE v. CHARLES, 2010 Ark. App. 815

CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, Appellant v. Wilmington O. CHARLES, Jr., Lloyd A. Marsha G. Freedman Living Trust, Arkansas Department of Finance Administration, Gary Moran, and Arkansas Federal Credit Union, Appellees CA 10-367Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. Opinion Delivered December 8, 2010 Appeal from the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Sixth Division, [Nos. CV2007-16477, 2009-1451], […]

Read More

MILLER v. DIRECTOR, E08-165 (Ark.App. 1-28-2009)

David L. MILLER, Appellant v. DIRECTOR et al., Appellee E08-165Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered January 28, 2009 The following cases appealed from the Arkansas Board of Review areaffirmed without written opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 5-2(b). Page 3

Read More

WILSON v. DODSON, ADMINISTRATOR, 203 Ark. 644 (1942)

WILSON v. DODSON, ADMINISTRATOR. No. 4-6575 158 S.W.2d 46Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 26, 1942. 1. EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS — CLAIMS. — An agreement by the heirs that if a certain son would move into the house with their father and care for him while he lived is insufficient to sustain a claim […]

Read More

RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. v. SHULL, 224 Ark. 476 (1955)

RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. v. SHULL No. 5-540 275 S.W.2d 882Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 24, 1955. [Supplemental opinion on rehearing delivered March 21, 1955.] 1. COMMON CARRIERS — DUTY OF CARE — REFRIGERATOR CAR. — An express company, in accepting strawberries for transportation from Horatio, Ark., to Minneapolis, was legally obligated to […]

Read More

FRETTE v. STATE, 58 Ark. App. 81 (1997)

Paul FRETTE v. STATE of Arkansas CA CR 96-477 947 S.W.2d 15Court of Appeals of Arkansas Divisions I II Opinion delivered June 18, 1997 1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — INVESTIGATORY STOP — JUSTIFICATION FOR. — Justification for an investigative stop depends upon whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the police have specific, particularized, and articulable […]

Read More

OSBORNE v. BOONEVILLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER, 2010 Ark. App. 315

Bertha OSBORNE, Appellant v. BOONEVILLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER and Public Employee Claims Division, Appellees CA 09-1083Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. Opinion Delivered April 14, 2010 Appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission, [No. F708055], Affirmed. M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge. Appellant Bertha Osborne appeals from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s determination that she failed […]

Read More

McDANIEL v. STATE, 294 Ark. 416 (1988)

Ray Eugene McDANIEL v. STATE of Arkansas No. CR 87-154 743 S.W.2d 795Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 1, 1988 1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — DISCOVERY — STATE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE DEFENDANT WITH PURELY REBUTTAL TESTIMONY. — Where appellant testified on direct examination that he had never been arrested or convicted of a […]

Read More