Mark LITCHFORD and Kristin Litchford, Appellant v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee CA11-504Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 14, 2011 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. SUBMISSION Page 1
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
McCULLA v. BROWN, 178 Ark. 1011 (1929)
McCULLA v. BROWN. 13 S.W.2d 314Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 28, 1929. 1. TRIAL — ERRONEOUS TRANSFER OF LAW CASE TO EQUITY. — A complaint at law alleging that, after conveying certain land to plaintiff’s grantor, defendant resold the same land to innocent purchasers and thereby defrauded plaintiff, held to state a legal […]
MINGO v. STATE, CACR08-147 (Ark.App. 8-20-2008)
Michael D. MINGO, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-147Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered August 20, 2008 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. SUBMISSIONS Page 5
REED v. STATE, 364 Ark. xxi (2005)
Reed v. State. No. CR 05-1000.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 27, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion for Belated Appeal denied.
ARKANSAS DEP’T OF HUMAN SERVS. v. THOMPSON, 331 Ark. 181 (1998)
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, St. Francis Division of Children and Family Services v. Richard THOMPSON 97-269 959 S.W.2d 46Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 22, 1998 1. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW PROCEDURE — LIMITED REVIEW OF AGENCY DECISIONS — DIRECTED TO DECISION OF AGENCY. — Review of administrative agency decisions, both by the circuit court […]
WESTERMAN v. SINGLETON, ADM’R, 9 Ark. App. 120 (1983)
Ken WESTERMAN v. Charles R. SINGLETON, Administrator of the Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Commission Division, State of Arkansas, Department of Finance and Administration; and Dora Louise POPE No. CA 82-436 653 S.W.2d 152Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered July 6, 1983 1. APPEAL ERROR — APPELLATE COURT MUST DETERMINE IF DECISION IS SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL […]
AUTRAND v. STATE, CACR09-901 (Ark.App. 4-14-2010)
Ryan R. AUTRAND, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR09-901Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 14, 2010 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Motion of David L. Dunagin for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $1,400.00. Page 4
MAY v. NATIONAL BANK OF EASTERN ARK., 231 Ark. 588 (1960)
MAY v. NATIONAL BANK OF EASTERN ARK. No. 5-1994. 331 S.W.2d 697Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 1, 1960. [Rehearing denied February 29, 1960] 1. COURT — JURISDICTION OF PERSON. — Appellants’ contention that the decree was void for lack of jurisdiction over their persons, held without merit in view of the constructive service […]
RED v. U. S. BANK, CA08-520 (Ark.App. 10-22-2008)
Monte RED and Michelle Red, Appellant v. U. S. BANK, Appellee CA08-520Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 22, 2008 Appeal from Saline Circuit. Appellee’s second motion to dismiss appeal is passed until case is submitted. Page 5
WILLIAMS v. STATE, CR99-1221 (Ark. 2-24-2011)
Frank WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR99-1221Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 24, 2011 Appeal from Lafayette Circuit. PER CURIAM ORDERS Application of Federal Public Defender for permission to be appointed as counsel on behalf of Movant is granted. Page 2
GOWERS v. STATE, CACR07-774 (Ark.App. 1-30-2008)
Barbara J. GOWERS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR07-774Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered January 30, 2008 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Page 6
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-ARKANSAS, INC v. JARRETT, 07-120 (Ark. 3-1-2007)
Beverly Enterprises-Arkansas, Inc. v. Mike Jarrett 07-120Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 1, 2007 Appeal from White Circuit. REVIEWS DENIED: Petitions for review were denied today in the following cases.
DELPOZO v. ARKANSAS DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICE, CA07-1289 (Ark.App. 3-5-2008)
Maria DELPOZO v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES CA07-1289Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinions Delivered March 5, 2008 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Page 7
FARMERS UNION MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. BLANKENSHIP, 231 Ark. 127 (1959)
FARMERS UNION MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. BLANKENSHIP No. 5-1931. 328 S.W.2d 360Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 2, 1959, 1. INSURANCE — COVERAGE AGAINST DIRECT LOSS AND DAMAGE BY FIRE. — Since the Policy insured against all “DIRECT LOSS AND DAMAGE BY FIRE” and since the chain saws and related articles were damaged, not […]
BOYD v. HONORABLE SMITH, 06-553 (Ark. 12-7-2006)
Stevie Christine Wilson Boyd v. Honorable Philip Gregory Smith, Circuit Judge 06-553Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 7, 2006 Appeal from Sharp Circuit. Motion to file brief is denied without prejudice.
EDGIN v. STATE, 99 Ark. App. xxi (2007)
Edgin v. State. No. CA CR 05-1348.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. June 27, 2007. GLADWIN, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication. affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
COTNER v. INT’L HARVESTER CO., 260 Ark. 885 (1977)
C. D. COTNER v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER Company No. 76-232 545 S.W.2d 627Supreme Court of Arkansas (Division II) Opinion delivered January 24, 1977 1. SALES — WARRANTIES, BREACH OF — NOTICE OF BREACH NECESSARY TO PRESERVE CAUSE OF ACTION. — In a suit seeking to recover damages, alleging breach of warranties of merchantability and of fitness […]
METCALF v. STATE, CR11-138 (Ark. 3-10-2011)
Theodore METCALF, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CR11-138Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 10, 2011 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Second Division. PER CURIAM ORDERS PETITIONS FOR REVIEW: Petitions for review was denied today in the following case. Page 1
WILLIAMS v. STATE, 22 Ark. App. 253 (1987)
Roger WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 87-42 739 S.W.2d 174Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I Opinion delivered November 11, 1987 1. JURY INSTRUCTIONS — TRIAL COURT NOT REQUIRED GIVE INSTRUCTIONS WHERE POINT IS SUFFICIENTLY COVERED BY ANOTHER INSTRUCTION — ENTRAPMENT AND DURESS INSTRUCTIONS ARE BASICALLY DIFFERENT. — Although the trial court […]
HANEY v. HOLT, 179 Ark. 403 (1929)
HANEY v. HOLT. 16 S.W.2d 463Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 22, 1929. 1. MORTGAGES — RECITAL OF PRIOR MORTGAGE. — A recital in a mortgage that it is subject to a prior mortgage is notice thereof, and the mortgagee takes subject to such prior mortgage, although it is unrecorded. 2. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS […]