ROBERTS CONTRACTING COMPANY, Inc., Appellant v. VALENTINE-WOOTEN ROAD PUBLIC FACILITY BOARD et al., Appellee CA08-751Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 3, 2008 Appeal from Pulaski Circuit, Thirteenth Division. Appellant’s motion to supplement jurisdictional statement and argument is granted. Substituted abstract, brief, and addendum due within thirty days. Page 4
Category: Arkansas Court Opinions
ROLSTON v. STATE, 90 Ark. App. XX (2005)
Rolston v. State. No. CA CR 04-588.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. March 9, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] VAUGHT, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication rebriefing ordered.
JONES v. TURNER, 08-1438 (Ark. 10-29-2009)
Guy JONES, Appellant v. Eric TURNER et al., Appellee 08-1438Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered October 29, 2009 Appeal from Faulkner Circuit.
PEOPLES LOAN INVESTMENT CO. v. KING, 220 Ark. 236 (1952)
ADMINISTRATOR, PEOPLES LOAN INVESTMENT COMPANY v. KING, ADMINISTRATOR No. 4-9699 247 S.W.2d 21Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 17, 1952. 1. CONTRACTS. — Where H borrowed money from K with which to purchase cars to operate as taxicabs, gave K a bill of sale of the cars and also gave appellant a bill of […]
ARK. HIGHWAY COMM’N v. CARRUTHERS, 246 Ark. 549 (1969)
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY COMM. v. Roy CARRUTHERS, et ux No. 5-4844 439 S.W.2d 40Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 7, 1969. 1. EMINENT DOMAIN — PROCEEDINGS TO TAKE PROPERTY ASSESS COMPENSATION — STATEMENTS OF THIRD PERSONS, ADMISSIBILITY OF. — Landowner’s testimony as to contractor’s estimate of the cost of building a bridge across a […]
WROTEN v. EVANS, 21 Ark. App. 134 (1987)
James A. WROTEN v. Howard A. EVANS and Shirley Harris Evans No. CA 86-419 729 S.W.2d 422Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I Opinion delivered May 27, 1987 1. EQUITY — DOCTRINE OF EXONERATION NOT RECOGNIZED IN ARKANSAS. — The equitable doctrine of exoneration, which gives a surety in certain situations the right to call […]
BARWICK v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE CO., 10-1076 (Ark. 3-10-2011)
Dustin BARWICK, Appellant v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY, Inc., Appellee 10-1076Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered March 10, 2011 Appeal from Benton Circuit. Motion for oral argument is denied. Page 1
WESTBROOK v. STATE, CACR11-127 (Ark.App. 11-2-2011)
Amber J. WESTBROOK, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR11-127Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered November 2, 2011 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. PER CURIAM ORDER Motion of Daniel Stewart for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $1,400.00. Page 2
TEMPLE COTTON OIL CO. v. BROWN, 198 Ark. 1076 (1939)
TEMPLE COTTON OIL COMPANY v. BROWN. No. 4-5570 132 S.W.2d 791Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 23, 1939. 1. MASTER AND SERVANT — ACTIONABLE NEGLIGENCE. — In appellee’s action for personal injuries sustained when, in replacing a drive shaft in the engine room of appellant, he stepped in oil on the floor and fell, […]
GRAYDON v. STATE, CACR09-798 (Ark.App. 7-28-2010)
Jonathan GRAYDON, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR09-798Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered July 28, 2010 Appeal from Lonoke Circuit. Motion of Jonathan T. Lane for attorney’s fees is granted. Allowed $1,400.00. Page 2
ADAMS v. STATE, 95 Ark. App. xvii (2006)
Adams, Thomas Jr. v. State. No. CA CR 05-1186.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. April 19, 2006. CRABTREE, J. Opinions not Designated for Publication, affirmed.
ARKANSAS D.H.S. v. PARKER, 88 Ark. App. 222 (2004)
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT of HUMAN SERVICES v. Ronald PARKER. No. CA 04-311. 197 S.W.3d 33Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered November 3, 2004. Rehearing denied December 8, 2004. 1. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW PROCEDURE — REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY DECISION — LIMITED IN SCOPE. — On review of an appeal from an administrative agency decision, the appellate […]
LONG v. STATE, CACR08-722 (Ark.App. 2-4-2009)
Jeremy LONG, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR08-722Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered February 4, 2009 Appeal from Sebastian Circuit, Greenwood District. SUBMISSIONS Page 7
DODSON v. STATE, 358 Ark. 372 (2004)
Johnny Paul DODSON v. STATE of Arkansas. CR 02-878. 191 S.W.3d 511Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered September 16, 2004 Rehearing denied October 21, 2004. 1. APPEAL ERROR — DOUBLE-JEOPARDY CONSIDERATIONS — CHALLENGE TO SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE ADDRESSED FIRST. FOR purposes of double jeopardy, the supreme court addresses appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the […]
BURRIS v. STATE, CACR11-99 (Ark.App. 4-27-2011)
Christopher B. BURRIS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CACR11-99Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered April 27, 2011 Appeal from Union Circuit. Appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel and for extension of brief time. Motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Appellant’s pro se points due within thirty days. Page 1
URSERY v. NIEHUSS, ADMR., 214 Ark. 753 (1949)
URSERY v. NIEHUSS, ADMR. No. 4-8766 217 S.W.2d 848Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 28, 1949. 1. JUDGMENTS — VACATION OF. — Appellants’ action to vacate the 1942 decree on the ground they were not present at the trial because they were told by both the clerk of the court and their attorney that […]
BROWN v. WOOD, 257 Ark. 252 (1974)
R. N. BROWN, et ux v. Warren E. WOOD, Judge, et al No. 74-36 516 S.W.2d 98Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 18, 1974 (Rehearing denied December 23, 1974] 1. ATTORNEY CLIENT — PRACTICE OF LAW, REGULATION OF — POWER AND AUTHORITY OF SUPREME COURT. — The Supreme Court has vested in it the […]
BOOTH v. STATE, 26 Ark. App. 115 (1989)
Richard BOOTH v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 88-34 761 S.W.2d 607Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. Substituted Opinion on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1989.[*] [*] JENNINGS, J., not participating on rehearing. 1. TRIAL — DIRECTED VERDICT — MOTION IS A CHALLENGE TO THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE. — A motion for […]
WITHERS v. STATE, 93 Ark. App. 276 (2005)
218 S.W.3d 386 Stephen WITHERS v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CA CR 03-1144.Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion delivered November 30, 2005. 1. MOTIONS — MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT — CHALLENGE TO SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE. — A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. 2. EVIDENCE — CHALLENGE […]
HUDGENS v. ARKANSAS DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV., CA10-155 (Ark.App. 9-15-2010)
Jeanne HUDGENS, Appellant v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee CA10-155Court of Appeals of Arkansas. Opinion Delivered September 15, 2010 Appeal from Union Circuit. SUBMISSIONS Page 6