URSERY v. NIEHUSS, ADMR., 214 Ark. 753 (1949)

URSERY v. NIEHUSS, ADMR. No. 4-8766 217 S.W.2d 848Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 28, 1949. 1. JUDGMENTS — VACATION OF. — Appellants’ action to vacate the 1942 decree on the ground they were not present at the trial because they were told by both the clerk of the court and their attorney that […]

Read More

BROWN v. WOOD, 257 Ark. 252 (1974)

R. N. BROWN, et ux v. Warren E. WOOD, Judge, et al No. 74-36 516 S.W.2d 98Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 18, 1974 (Rehearing denied December 23, 1974] 1. ATTORNEY CLIENT — PRACTICE OF LAW, REGULATION OF — POWER AND AUTHORITY OF SUPREME COURT. — The Supreme Court has vested in it the […]

Read More

BOOTH v. STATE, 26 Ark. App. 115 (1989)

Richard BOOTH v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 88-34 761 S.W.2d 607Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. Substituted Opinion on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1989.[*] [*] JENNINGS, J., not participating on rehearing. 1. TRIAL — DIRECTED VERDICT — MOTION IS A CHALLENGE TO THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE. — A motion for […]

Read More

ARKADELPHIA MILLING CO. v. GODDARD, 176 Ark. 958 (1928)

ARKADELPHIA MILLING COMPANY v. GODDARD. 4 S.W.2d 923Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 9, 1928. 1. APPEAL AND ERROR — ORDER DIRECTING VERDICT. — On appeal from the judgment on a directed verdict for defendants, the court will give the testimony tending to support plaintiff’s cause of action its highest probative value. 2. GUARANTY […]

Read More

ALLEN v. CLARK, 233 Ark. 394 (1961)

ALLEN v. CLARK. No. 5-2354 345 S.W.2d 371Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 3, 1961. [Rehearing denied May 8, 1961.] 1. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — DEATH DUE TO INTERNAL HEMORRHAGE, SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE. — The commission denied an award for compensation after the only medical witness testified that the worker’s death was probably due to […]

Read More

CUPP, ADM’R v. POCAHONTAS FED. S.L., 242 Ark. 566 (1967)

Vance CUPP, Jr., ADMINISTRATOR v. POCAHONTAS FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN Association et al No. 5-4235 414 S.W.2d 596Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 8, 1967 [Rehearing denied June 5, 1967.] 1. BANKS BANKING — ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS — OPERATION EFFECT OF CONTROLLING STATUTE. — Accounts established under Act 343 of 1939 and prior to effective […]

Read More

GIPSON v. BROWN, 295 Ark. 371 (1988)

John GIPSON, Bill Hefley, M.D., Coolidge Faulkner, Richard Conder, James Dixon, A.J. Tomme, and Jack Case v. Joe BROWN, Bob Scott, and Tip Nelms, D.D.S. No. 87-253 749 S.W.2d 297Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 9, 1988 1. APPEAL ERROR — REVIEW OF CHANCERY DECISION — WHILE SOME CASES MANDATE DISMISSAL, WHERE REVIEW WAS […]

Read More

SEALE v. STATE, 367 Ark. xxi (2006)

Seale v. State. No. CR 05-1077.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 21, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, affirmed.

Read More

C. P. v. STATE, 2011 Ark. App. 415

C. P., Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. CA 11-130Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. Opinion Delivered June 1, 2011 Appeal from the Craighead County Circuit Court, Western District, [JV-2007-29], Honorable Barbara Halsey, Judge, Dismissed. DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. C.P. was adjudicated delinquent on February 7, 2007. He now appeals from an October 20, […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. ATTY. GEN. v. LION OIL REFINING CO., 171 Ark. 209 (1926)

STATE EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL v. LION OIL REFINING COMPANY. 284 S.W. 33Supreme Court of Arkansas. Opinion delivered May 24, 1926. 1. TAXATION — UNIT SYSTEM. — The unit system of taxation can be applied only to public carriers and similar public corporations. 2. TAXATION — OIL COMPANY. — There is no organic relation between […]

Read More

WARD FURN. MFG. CO. v. PICKLE, 174 Ark. 463 (1927)

WARD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. PICKLE. 295 S.W. 727Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 20, 1927. 1. MASTER AND SERVANT — TEST OF SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT. — A test as to whether an employee was acting within or without the scope of his employment or the line of his duty at the time when […]

Read More

PACE v. STATE, 2010 Ark. App. 491

Kimberly Dione PACE, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee CA CR 09-1347Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. Opinion Delivered June 16, 2010 Appeal from the Pulaski County Circuit Court, [No. CR 2009-316], Honorable Willard Proctor, Jr., Judge, Affirmed. ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge. Appellant Kimberly Dione Pace appeals her conviction by the Pulaski County Circuit […]

Read More

HAWK v. STATE, 38 Ark. App. 1 (1992)

Jeffrey David HAWK v. STATE of Arkansas No. CA CR 91-102 826 S.W.2d 824Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I Opinion delivered March 25, 1992 1. SEARCH SEIZURE — PROBABLE CAUSE FOR WARRANT — TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES TEST. — Under the totality of the circumstances test, a warrant is issued based upon a practical, […]

Read More

ESTEROSTO v. STATE, 2010 Ark. App. 213

ESTEROSTO, LLC, Appellant v. Randy D. KINSEY, et al., Dianna L. Kinsey, Twin City Bank, Daniel Family Trust, John Ostie, Sr., Estate of John Ostie, Sr., Preola Conway Lockhart, Estate of Dolly Moore and Ella M. Bogard, Appellees No. CA 09-984Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. Opinion Delivered March 3, 2010 Appeal from the […]

Read More

GLOVER v. LANGFORD, 49 Ark. App. 30 (1995)

Kenneth GLOVER v. Paula Glover LANGFORD CA 94-6 894 S.W.2d 959Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I Opinion delivered March 22, 1995 1. APPEAL ERROR — NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE DISPOSITION OF POST-TRIAL MOTION WAS INEFFECTIVE. — The appellant’s first notice of appeal, filed as it was prior to the disposition of the post-trial […]

Read More

SMITH v. DANIELS, 269 Ark. 817 (1980)

Ralph SMITH v. Charles L. DANIELS Director of Labor, and SWAFFORD HEATING No. CA 80-115 601 S.W.2d 235Court of Appeals of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 25, 1980 Released for publication July 8, 1980 1. EMPLOYMENT “SECURITY — VOLUNTARILY LEAVING WORK — DENIAL OF UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROPER. — Where claimant, after working two days for Employer […]

Read More