CLAIM NO. E911079

CHARLES MOORE, EMPLOYEE, CLAIMANT v. PYRAMID CONSTRUCTION/ CERTIFIED SYSTEMS, INC., EMPLOYER, RESPONDENT, CUNNINGHAM LINDSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER, RESPONDENT

Before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission
ORDER FILED JANUARY 23, 2002

Upon review before the FULL COMMISSION in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.

Claimant appeared pro se.

Respondents represented by the HONORABLE MIKE ROBERTS, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas.

ORDER
This case comes on for review before the Full Commission on claimant’s motions to hold respondent in contempt and to submit additional evidence.

After our consideration of claimant’s motion to hold respondent in contempt, respondent’s objection thereto, and all other matters properly before the Commission, we find that claimant’s motion must be denied.

Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-705(c)(1)(A)and (C) (Supp. 2001) provides that all evidence shall be presented by each party at the initial hearing and that additional evidence shall be allowed only at the discretion of the Commission. In the exercise of this discretion, we must consider whether claimant has proven that the additional evidence is relevant; that it is not cumulative; that it would change the results; and that claimant exercised diligence in obtaining and seeking to introduce the evidence.Mason v. Lauck, 232 Ark. 891, 340 S.W.2d 575 (1960); Haygood v. Belcher, 5 Ark. App. 127, 633 S.W.2d 391 (1982).

In the present case, we find that claimant failed to prove that he exercised diligence in obtaining and seeking to introduce the evidence. Therefore, claimant’s motion to submit additional evidence is denied.

Accordingly, we find that claimant’s motions to hold respondent in contempt and to submit additional evidence should be, and hereby are, denied. Additionally, the Clerk of the Commission is directed to establish a briefing schedule forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________ ELDON F. COFFMAN, Chairman
______________________________ MIKE WILSON, Commissioner
______________________________ SHELBY W. TURNER, Commissioner

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: E911079

Recent Posts

GLENN v. GLENN, 44 Ark. 46 (1884)

44 Ark. 46 Supreme Court of Arkansas. Glenn v. Glenn. November Term, 1884. Headnotes 1.…

2 weeks ago

HOLLAND v. ARKANSAS, 2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017) 510 S.W.3d 311 WESLEY GENE HOLLAND, APPELLANT v. STATE OF…

8 years ago

COOPER v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SERVICES, 2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 304GRAYLON COOPER, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, PUBLIC…

8 years ago

SCHALL v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 302DIANNA LYNN SCHALL, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES,…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2016-094

Opinion No. 2016-094 March 21, 2017 The Honorable John Cooper State Senator 62 CR 396…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-038

Opinion No. 2017-038 March 23, 2017 The Honorable Henry �Hank� Wilkins, IV Jefferson County Judge…

8 years ago