NARVAIZ v. TYSON POULTRY, 2010 AWCC 101

CLAIM NO. F710978

FRANCISCO NARVAIZ, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT v. TYSON POULTRY, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT TYNET CORPORATION, INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT

Before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission
OPINION FILED JUNE 18, 2010

Upon review before the FULL COMMISSION in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.

Claimant represented by the HONORABLE CONRAD T. ODUM, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, Arkansas.

Respondent represented by the HONORABLE E. DIANE GRAHAM, Attorney at Law, Fort Smith, Arkansas.

NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER
The Full Commission, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-713(d) (Repl. 2002), finds that a clerical error exists in our opinion filed June 10, 2010. Page 17 of the opinion states, “The Full Commission finds that the claimant proved he was entitled to additional wage-loss disability benefits from April 28, 2008 through August 6, 2008.” The opinion should state, “The Full Commission finds that the claimant proved he was entitled to additional temporary total disability benefits from April 28, 2008 through August 6, 2008.”

Page 2

The Full Commission’s June 10, 2010 opinion is therefore modified to reflect the proper period of temporary total disability benefits. In all other respects, the opinion shall remain the same and shall not be otherwise affected.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________________ A. WATSON BELL, Chairman

________________________________ KAREN H. McKINNEY, Commissioner
________________________________ PHILIP A. HOOD, Commissioner

Page 1