Ed Gilbert

Attorney General of Arkansas — Opinion
May 29, 1987

STEVE CLARK, Attorney General

Honorable Ed Gilbert State Representative District 5 P. O. Box 633 Mountain Home, Arkansas 72653

Dear Representative Gilbert:

This is in response to your request for an official opinion wherein you asked:

1. Does the provision of Act 122 of 1987 that requires red reflective numbers be attached to motorboats apply to all motorboats or only to those numbered after the effective date of the Act?
2. Is the requirement that motorboat numbers be red in color superseded by the federal requirement that motorboat numbers be in a color which contrasts with the color of the motorboat?

Act 122 contains no provision for allowing boats already numbered to retain those numbers, and Section 9 of the Act repeals all laws and parts of laws in conflict with the Act. Therefore the answer to your first question is that all boats must have the red reflective numbers after the effective date of the act.

The federal requirement you asked about appears at 33 CFR 173.27(a)(3) and states that each number must contrast with the color of the background and be distinctly visible and legible.” Act 122 states that the numbers are to be attached in such manner and position on the boat as prescribed by rules and regulations of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission.

There is no direct conflict between the requirements because the federal requirement speaks of contrasting with the background, not necessarily the hull of the boat. The Game and Fish Commission could require that if the red numbers do not contrast with the boat, then a different color background must be provided where the numbers are attached. Since there is no direct conflict, the requirements of Act 122 are not superseded by the federal requirement.

The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Assistant Attorney General Charles R. Lucus.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 1987-177

Recent Posts

GLENN v. GLENN, 44 Ark. 46 (1884)

44 Ark. 46 Supreme Court of Arkansas. Glenn v. Glenn. November Term, 1884. Headnotes 1.…

1 week ago

HOLLAND v. ARKANSAS, 2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017) 510 S.W.3d 311 WESLEY GENE HOLLAND, APPELLANT v. STATE OF…

8 years ago

COOPER v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SERVICES, 2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 304GRAYLON COOPER, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, PUBLIC…

8 years ago

SCHALL v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 302DIANNA LYNN SCHALL, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES,…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2016-094

Opinion No. 2016-094 March 21, 2017 The Honorable John Cooper State Senator 62 CR 396…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-038

Opinion No. 2017-038 March 23, 2017 The Honorable Henry �Hank� Wilkins, IV Jefferson County Judge…

8 years ago