Steve Bell

Attorney General of Arkansas — Opinion
June 2, 1994

Winston Bryant, Attorney General

The Honorable Steve Bell State Senator 500 East Main, Suite 208 Batesville, Arkansas 72503

Dear Senator Bell:

This is in response to your request, on behalf of the Mayor of McCrory, for an opinion on the following question:

When a city has one retired policeman drawing benefits from a local pension fund, established prior to 1983, and that fund becomes depleted before the state turnback is received, does the recipient continue to receive only the 10% of bonds and fines plus a local court cost for that fund that is collected, or does the city have to make up the difference in what is collected through those costs and the amount of his monthly pension from the general fund?

I assume that “state turnback” refers to the insurance monies received by August 1 of each year under A.C.A. 24-11-301 to -303 (1987), and that the 10% of “bonds and fines” refers to those funds received by the pension fund pursuant to A.C.A. 24-11-413 (Cum. Supp. 1993).

It is my opinion that the retiree should receive any amounts in the pension fund which are available to pay his benefit, but that the city should not make up the difference from the city general fund. In this regard A.C.A. 24-11-416 provides as follows:

If, at any time, there should not be sufficient money in the fund to pay each person a full amount to which he may be entitled, the beneficiaries shall be paid by prorating the fund available among them.

Although there is only one beneficiary in the facts presented by your question, it is my opinion, in light of the language above, that he should receive only the available monies, without the difference being made up with city general funds. It should be noted, additionally, that the statutes do not provide for “backpay” when sufficient funds are received, but only the monthly pension amount, assuming funds become available. This was essentially the conclusion of Op. Att’y Gen. 92-345 (copy enclosed) (in response to question 4 therein).

The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Deputy Attorney General Elana C. Wills.

Sincerely, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General

WB:cyh

Enclosure

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 1994-091

Recent Posts

GLENN v. GLENN, 44 Ark. 46 (1884)

44 Ark. 46 Supreme Court of Arkansas. Glenn v. Glenn. November Term, 1884. Headnotes 1.…

2 weeks ago

HOLLAND v. ARKANSAS, 2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017) 510 S.W.3d 311 WESLEY GENE HOLLAND, APPELLANT v. STATE OF…

8 years ago

COOPER v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SERVICES, 2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 304GRAYLON COOPER, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, PUBLIC…

8 years ago

SCHALL v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 302DIANNA LYNN SCHALL, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES,…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2016-094

Opinion No. 2016-094 March 21, 2017 The Honorable John Cooper State Senator 62 CR 396…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-038

Opinion No. 2017-038 March 23, 2017 The Honorable Henry �Hank� Wilkins, IV Jefferson County Judge…

8 years ago