CLAIM NO. E702801

SHEILA PUCKETT, EMPLOYEE, CLAIMANT v. TARGET STORES, INC., EMPLOYER, RESPONDENT and TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO., CARRIER, RESPONDENT

Before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission
ORDER FILED JULY 31, 1998

Upon review before the FULL COMMISSION, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.

Claimant represented by STEVEN R. DAVIS, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Respondent represented by PHILLIP CUFFMAN, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas.

[1] ORDER
[2] This matter is currently before the Full Commission on claimant’s Motion to Supplement the Record. After considering claimant’s motion, respondent’s response thereto, and all other matters properly before the Commission, we find that claimant’s motion must be denied. [3] Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-705(c)(1) provides that all evidence must be submitted at the initial hearing on the claim. In order to submit new evidence, the claimant must show that the new evidence is relevant; that it is not cumulative; that it would change the result of the case; and that he was diligent in presenting the evidence to the Commission. Mason v. Lauck, 232 Ark. 891, 340 S.W.2d 575 (1960). Haygood v. Belcher, 5 Ark. App. 127, 633 S.W.2d 391 (1982). [4] Claimant had ample opportunity to compile all relevant evidence necessary to prove her case prior to the hearing in this claim. There has been no showing that the new evidence is relevant, that it would change the results of the claim or that claimant acted diligently in obtaining it. Moreover, to allow claimant to introduce this newly generated evidence would deprive respondent of its right of cross-examination. [5] Once a decision has been rendered against a party, the party cannot come back and attempt to prove her case on appeal with additional evidence. Accordingly, for those reasons set forth herein, we find that claimant’s motion to submit additional evidence must be denied. [6] IT IS SO ORDERED.

ELDON F. COFFMAN, Chairman MIKE WILSON, Commissioner

[7] Commissioner Humphrey dissents.
jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: E702801

Recent Posts

GLENN v. GLENN, 44 Ark. 46 (1884)

44 Ark. 46 Supreme Court of Arkansas. Glenn v. Glenn. November Term, 1884. Headnotes 1.…

1 week ago

HOLLAND v. ARKANSAS, 2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017) 510 S.W.3d 311 WESLEY GENE HOLLAND, APPELLANT v. STATE OF…

8 years ago

COOPER v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SERVICES, 2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 304GRAYLON COOPER, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, PUBLIC…

8 years ago

SCHALL v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 302DIANNA LYNN SCHALL, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES,…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2016-094

Opinion No. 2016-094 March 21, 2017 The Honorable John Cooper State Senator 62 CR 396…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-038

Opinion No. 2017-038 March 23, 2017 The Honorable Henry �Hank� Wilkins, IV Jefferson County Judge…

8 years ago