Bayless v. Beck. 04-69.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 24, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motion For Extension Of Time To File Brief Granted.
Articles Tagged: 358 Ark. XVI
DEERE v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Deere v. State. CR 03-761.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 17, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
GRANT v. KEITH, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Grant v. Keith. CR 04-785.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 16, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Moot. Page XVII
CRAIN v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Crain v. State. CR 03-734.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 23, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
BLOUNT v. HARRIS, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Blount v. Harris. 04-104.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 17, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motion For Reconsideration Denied.
BANKS v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Banks v. State. CR 03-160.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 23, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Affirmed; Motion To Supplement Appeal Brief Denied.
FLETCHER v. NORRIS, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Fletcher v. Norris. 03-929.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 23, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
BARDIN-ZAPATA v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Bardin-Zapata v. State. CR 04-580.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 24, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Petition For Writ Of Certiorari Dismissed; Motion For Expedited Proceeding Moot.
BURNARD v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Burnard v. State. CR 04-635.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 23, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motions For Belated Appeal Of Order And To Lodge Tendered Record Denied; Petition For Writ Of Certiorari Moot.
GIBSON v. LOONEY, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Gibson v. Looney. CR 04-830.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 16, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Moot.
ELLISON v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Ellison v. State. CR 04-723.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 23, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motion To Supplement Record With Transcript Of Evidentiary Hearing Granted. Pro Se Motion To Compel Attorney To Represent Appellant On Appeal And To Stay Briefing Schedule Denied In […]
ANDERSON v. MOODY, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Anderson v. Moody. 04-620.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 24, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Denied.
CLENNEY v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Clenney v. State. CR 03-647.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 16, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motion For Extension Of Time To File Substituted Brief Granted; Pro Se Motion For Duplication Of Substituted Brief At Public Expense Denied.
CLENNEY v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Clenney v. State. CR 03-647.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 24, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Motion For Extension Of Time To File Substituted Brief Granted.
ARNOLD v. STATE, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Arnold v. State. CR 03-675.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 16, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Affirmed; Petitions Denied.
ANDERSON v. MOODY, 358 Ark. XVI (2004)
Anderson v. Moody. 04-620.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 16, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Pro Se Subsequent Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Denied.