Kelly v. Norris. No. 03-1295.Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 28, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Affirmed.
Articles Tagged: 362 Ark. XVIII
MUNSON v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Munson v. State. No. CR 04-423.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 9, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Affirmed.
MEEKS v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Meeks v. State. No. 05-168.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 19, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motions for Appointment of Counsel, for Appointment of Jury, and for Discovery moot; appeal dismissed.
McCLELLAN v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
McClellan v. State. No. CR 04-1318.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 26, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motion to Extend Time to File Brief granted; pro se Motion for Appointment of Counsel and to Hold Time in Abeyance denied.
KILCREASE v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Kilcrease v. State. No. 04-626.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 16, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Affirmed.
KELLEY v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Kelley v. State. No. CR 04-233.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 16, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication reversed and remanded.
MAYER v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Mayer v. State. No. CR 84-104.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 2, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motion for Photocopy of Trial Transcript at Public Expense denied.
MOSLEY v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Mosley v. State. No. CR 05-243.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 12, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motions for Extension of Time to File Brief and for Production of Documents at Public Expense moot; appeal dismissed.
McCOY v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
McCoy v. State. No. CR 04-505.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 26, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motion to File Belated Reply Brief denied.
JOHNSON v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Julius Jack Johnson v. State. No. CR 04-911.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 16, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Affirmed.
MARROQUIN v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Marroquin v. State. No. CR 04-615.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 16, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Appeal Dismissed.
LOONEY v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Looney v. State. No. CR 04-578.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 26, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Affirmed.
PARMLEY v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Philip Parmley v. State. No. CA CR 04-692.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 26, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motion to File Belated Motion to Accept Certification of Appeal denied. Page XIX
MARTIN v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Martin v. State. No. CR 04-946.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 19, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motions for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief and for Leave to File Enlarged Reply Brief granted.
MARSHALL v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Marshall v. State. Nos. CR 05-231 and CR 05-232.Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 19, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se. PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Motions to Consolidate Appeals, for Extension of Time to File Brief, and for Appointment of Counsel moot; appeals dismissed.
McDONALD v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
McDonald v. State. No. CR 04-529.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 9, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Affirmed.
NANCE v. STATE, 362 Ark. XVIII (2005)
Nance v. State. No. CR 99-365.Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 28, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions not Designated for Publication Petition to Reinvest Jurisdiction in the Trial Court to Consider a Petition for Writ of Error coram nobis denied.