Articles Tagged: 363 Ark. XVIII

Bullock v. State. No. CR 04-823.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 6, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. affirmed.

Billy Joe Campbell v. State. No. CR 03-570.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 13, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Motion for Extension of Time granted.

Black v. State. No. CR 05-461.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 30, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Appeal denied.

Burton v. State. No. CR 05-494.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 30, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Motion for Copy of Record on Appeal and Extension of Time to File Brief granted.

Anderson v. State. No. CR 04-621.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 6, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Motion for Order Compelling the Appellee to Brief All Points of Appeal Argued by Appellant denied.

Beverly v. State. No. CR 05-150.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 30, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Motion for Access to Trial Transcript and to Hold Time to File Appellant’s Brief in Abeyance granted.

Arthur D. Davis v. Shirron. No. CR 05-578.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 22, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus moot.

Richard Alan Davis v. State. No. CR 05-632.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 30, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Motion for Belated Appeal of Amended Judgment denied.

Billy Joe Cambell v. State. No. CR 03-570.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 23, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Substituted Brief granted in part and denied in part.

Clausen v. State. No. CR 05-710.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 13, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus dismissed.

Alvin Lamont Davis v. State. No. CR 92-575.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 6, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Petition for Leave to Proceed on Writ of Error coram nobis denied. Page XIX

Danzie v. State. No. CR 04-381.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 29, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. rebriefing ordered.

Bradford v. Goodson. No. CR 05-794.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 22, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus denied.

Clay v. State. No. CR 95-1145.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 30, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. pro se Petition to Reinvest Jurisdiction in the Trial Court to Consider a Writ of Error coram nobis denied.

Alexander/Ryahim v. Norris. No. 04-1303.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 23, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. affirmed.

Brown v. State. No. CR 04-761.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 29, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. affirmed.

Billy Ray Davis v. State. No. CR 04-340.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 29, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. affirmed.