Loveless v. State. No. CR 05-648.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 20, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion for Stay of Appeal and Petitions for Writ of Certiorari denied; Pro Se Petition to “Enjoinder Rule 37 Appeal to Writ of Certiorari” moot.
Articles Tagged: 364 Ark. xx
LOVE v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2006)
Love v. State. No. CR 05-1265.Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 12, 2006. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion for Rule on Clerk denied.
MORRIS v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Morris, Calvin v. State. No. CR 05-410.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 3, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion to Withdraw Petition or for Extension of Time denied.
McCOY v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
McCoy v. State. No. CR 04-505.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 10, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. affirmed.
MORRIS v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Morris, DeCarlos v. State. No. CR 04-1387.Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 1, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. affirmed.
MORGAN v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2006)
Morgan v. State. No. CR 05-1163.Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 5, 2006. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion to Proceed with Appeal treated as motion for rule on clerk and denied.
McDONALD v. NORRIS, 364 Ark. xx (2006)
McDonald v. Norris. No. 05-135.Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 12, 2006. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion for Appoinment of Counsel denied.
LACY v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Lacy v. State. No. CR 05-69.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 3, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motions for Extension of Time to File Substituted Brief and for Transcript of Records granted.
McJAMES v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
McJames, Ronald Donell v. State. No. CR 05-939.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 27, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion for Extension of Time and Copy of Record on Appeal moot; appeal dismissed.
McARTY v. MORGAN, 364 Ark. xx (2006)
McArty, Randall Thomas v. Morgan. No. 04-1086.Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 5, 2006. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. petition for rehearing denied.
NELSON v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Nelson, Stanley Isaac v. State. No. CR 04-732.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 17, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Petition for Rehearing denied. Page xxi
McJAMES v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
McJames, Ronald Donell v. State. No. CR 05-939.Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 8, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal of Appeal denied.
NELSON v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Nelson, Mario Antuan v. State. No. CR 05-408.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 27, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion to Supplement the Record granted; rebriefing ordered.
LOCKHART v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Lockhart v. State. No. 04-1337.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 10, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. affirmed.
MAYBERRY v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Mayberry v. State. No. CR 05-813.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 3, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. Pro Se Motion for Extension of Time granted.
McARTY v. MORGAN, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
McArty, Randall Thomas v. Morgan. No. 04-1086.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 3, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. affirmed.
MARTIN v. STATE, 364 Ark. xx (2005)
Martin v. State. No. CR 04-946.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 10, 2005. PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated for Publication. affirmed.