Articles Tagged: 367 Ark. xxi

Seale v. State. No. CR 05-1077.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 21, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, affirmed.

Stanfield v. State. No. CR 06-826.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 28, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Appointment of Counsel moot; appeal dismissed.

Turbyfill v. State. No. CR 06-405.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 26, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, affirmed. Page xxii

Posey v. State. No. CR 06-518.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief moot; appeal dismissed.

Raynor v. State. No. CR 06-655.Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Belated Appeal denied.

Smith v. State. No. CR 06-938.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 12, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Rule on Clerk moot; Motion for Belated Appeal denied.

Phiathep v. State. No. CR 06-422.Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 2, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, affirmed.

Trowbridge v. State. No. CR 06-475.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 21, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Belated Appeal granted.

Reed v. State. No. CR 06-30.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 28, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, affirmed.

Savage v. State. No. CR 06-526.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 12, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion to File Belated Reply Brief granted.

Robinson v. State. No. CR 06-954.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 26, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief and Petition for Writ of Certiorari moot; appeal dismissed.

Saul v. State. No. CR 06-621.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 5, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Extension of Time moot; appeal dismissed.

Thompson v. State. No. CR 06-910.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 26, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motions for Extension of Time to File Brief and for Transcript moot; appeal dismissed.

Scott, Ricky L. v. Story. No. 06-54.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 21, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Petition for Writ of Mandamus moot.

Scott, Ricky Lee v. State. No. CR 98-1167.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 12, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Petition to Reinvest Jurisdiction in the Trial Court to Consider a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis denied.

Russell v. State. No. CR 06-939.Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 12, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Motion for Rule on Clerk denied.

Salter v. Looney. No. CR 06-786.Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 28, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Pro Se PER CURIAM. Opinions Not Designated For Publication, Petition for Writ of Mandamus denied.