YOUNG v. BOAR’S HEAD PROVISION COMPANY, INC., 2004 AWCC 155

CLAIM NO. F303178

BETTY S. YOUNG, EMPLOYEE, CLAIMANT v. BOAR’S HEAD PROVISION COMPANY, INC., EMPLOYER, RESPONDENT, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE, COMPANY, CARRIER, RESPONDENT

Before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission
ORDER FILED AUGUST 26, 2004

Upon review before the FULL COMMISSION, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.

Claimant represented by the HONORABLE GEORGE BAILEY, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Respondent represented by the HONORABLE ERIC NEWKIRK, Attorney at Law, Little Rock, Arkansas.

ORDER
Presently before the Commission is claimant’s Motion to Enforce Aspects of Award Not on Appeal. After review of claimant’s motion, respondents’ response thereto, and all other matters properly before the Commission, we find that the claimant’s motion must be denied.

Claimant contends that the respondents should be forced to pay the claimant medical benefits, including but not limited to medical mileage reimbursement. Obviously, respondent’s Notice of Appeal reflects that the respondents are appealing the Administrative Law Judge’s finding that the respondent’s controverted the claimant’s entitlement to medical mileage. Therefore, we find that whether the claimant is entitled to medical mileage based upon the format in which the claimant submitted her request is clearly an issue on appeal. Accordingly, we find that the claimant’s motion to enforce payment of medical mileage addresses an issue on appeal and must therefore be denied. As for the medical benefits, respondents indicate in their response that they stand ready, willing and able to pay all reasonable and necessary medical expenses upon receipt of proper payment requests. Claimant’s counsel has not offered documentation of submissions for payment, he has only submitted medical records. As there is no evidence that these medical records comply with rule 30, we find that the claimant’s motion to enforce payment of medical benefits must be denied. However, should respondents fail to pay appropriate medical bills after submission of the proper documentation, we will reconsider our findings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________ OLAN W. REEVES, Chairman
_______________________________ KAREN H. McKINNEY, Commissioner

Commissioner Turner dissents.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: F303178

Recent Posts

GLENN v. GLENN, 44 Ark. 46 (1884)

44 Ark. 46 Supreme Court of Arkansas. Glenn v. Glenn. November Term, 1884. Headnotes 1.…

7 days ago

HOLLAND v. ARKANSAS, 2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 49 (Ark.App. 2017) 510 S.W.3d 311 WESLEY GENE HOLLAND, APPELLANT v. STATE OF…

8 years ago

COOPER v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SERVICES, 2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 58 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 304GRAYLON COOPER, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, PUBLIC…

8 years ago

SCHALL v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)

2017 Ark.App. 50 (Ark.App. 2017)510 S.W.3d 302DIANNA LYNN SCHALL, APPELLANTv.UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES,…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2016-094

Opinion No. 2016-094 March 21, 2017 The Honorable John Cooper State Senator 62 CR 396…

8 years ago

Arkansas Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-038

Opinion No. 2017-038 March 23, 2017 The Honorable Henry �Hank� Wilkins, IV Jefferson County Judge…

8 years ago